«

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg

Will we ever get it right?

Take Care,
Dudley

On May 29, 12:07*am, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
>
> Will we ever get it right?

Take the ****ing camera out of the way and maybe you'll beable to get
a bite out of the thing.

Sheesh.

--
YOP...

On May 29, 1:19*am, Jeff Jones <jj197109...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
>
> <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
> >http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
>
> >Will we ever get it right?
>
> >Take Care,
> >Dudley
>
> It just gets sadder and sadder.

But it does give someone like you with no talent, skill or appreciable
knowledge something to aspire to.

Vance

On May 29, 4:15*am, Jeff Jones <jj197109...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 03:58:27 -0700 (PDT), Vance <vance.l...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 29, 1:19*am, Jeff Jones <jj197109...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
>
> >> <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
> >> >http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
>
> >> >Will we ever get it right?
>
> >> >Take Care,
> >> >Dudley
>
> >> It just gets sadder and sadder.
>
> >But it does give someone like you with no talent, skill or appreciable
> >knowledge something to aspire to.
>
> >Vance
>
> Are you still upset to learn that you can only create poorly done tourists'
> crapshots? I thought so.
>
> Those wacky oversaturated buildings tilted every which way were a good
> laugh. I don't think I've ever seen tourists' crapshots done so badly
> before.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

And they're still so much better than anything you can do that, again,
you have a level of accomplishment to aspire to.

Vance

On Sat, 29 May 2010 03:19:16 -0500, Jeff Jones <>
wrote:
: On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
: <> wrote:
:
: >http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
: >
: >Will we ever get it right?
: >
: >Take Care,
: >Dudley
:
: It just gets sadder and sadder.

Dudley's handicap is that he's nearly blind. He overcomes it as best he can.

Your handicap is that you're insane. You don't overcome it at all.

Quite possibly, Dudley is the luckier of the two.

Bob

Robert Coe wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 03:19:16 -0500, Jeff Jones <>
> wrote:
> : On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
> : <> wrote:
> :
> : >http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
> : >
> : >Will we ever get it right?

> :
> : It just gets sadder and sadder.
>
> Dudley's handicap is that he's nearly blind. He overcomes it as best he can.
>
> Your handicap is that you're insane. You don't overcome it at all.
>
> Quite possibly, Dudley is the luckier of the two.

Yes, indeed.

The pest of many names is not insane most likely, but is consumed by
such hate and fear that he's frozen in a pattern of anonymous, hateful
and frequent harassment of any who'll respond. Er, well, maybe that's
one definition of insane..

--
John McWilliams

On May 29, 7:33*am, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Robert Coe wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 May 2010 03:19:16 -0500, Jeff Jones <jj197109...@mailinator.com>
> > wrote:
> > : On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
> > : <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
> > :
> > : >http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
> > : >
> > : >Will we ever get it right?
> > :
> > : It just gets sadder and sadder.
>
> > Dudley's handicap is that he's nearly blind. He overcomes it as best he can.
>
> > Your handicap is that you're insane. You don't overcome it at all.
>
> > Quite possibly, Dudley is the luckier of the two.
>
> Yes, indeed.
>
> The pest of many names is not insane most likely, but is consumed by
> such hate and fear that he's frozen in a pattern of anonymous, hateful
> and frequent harassment of any who'll respond. Er, well, maybe that's
> one definition of insane..
>
> --
> John McWilliams- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

He's not insane, but his posts across several forums display a
personality that combines characteristics of both narssisistic and
antisocial personality disorders. Of the two, the antisocial
characteristics are more forward, but the foundation may be in the
weak ego structure indicated by the narssisistic tendency.

Vance

"Nervous Nick" <> wrote in message
news:9683c376-8111-4481-8a86-...
On May 29, 12:07 am, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote:
> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
>
> Will we ever get it right?

Take the ****ing camera out of the way and maybe you'll beable to get
a bite out of the thing.

Sheesh.

--
YOP...


But then, what challenge would there be?

Take Care,
Dudley

"Jeff Jones" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 05:07:56 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
> <> wrote:
>
>>http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tillTrying.jpg
>>
>>Will we ever get it right?
>>
>>Take Care,
>>Dudley
>>
>
> It just gets sadder and sadder.
>

Your just PO'd you didn't shoot it...

Take Care,
Dudley

Vance wrote:
> On May 29, 7:33 am, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> The pest of many names is not insane most likely, but is consumed by
>> such hate and fear that he's frozen in a pattern of anonymous, hateful
>> and frequent harassment of any who'll respond. Er, well, maybe that's
>> one definition of insane..

>
> He's not insane, but his posts across several forums display a
> personality that combines characteristics of both narssisistic and
> antisocial personality disorders. Of the two, the antisocial
> characteristics are more forward, but the foundation may be in the
> weak ego structure indicated by the narssisistic tendency.

No argument.
Do you realize, Vance, that a number of usenet folk won't see your posts
as you're using Google to post from?

--
john mcwilliams