«

Is there a difference in the way you would configure PAT between versions
6.3 and 8?

I have tried to use working configuration from 6.3, below, on 8.0 and it
didn't work.

access-list inbound extended permit tcp any interface natfg eq https
static (inside,tpfg) tcp 96.57.168.251 https 192.168.1.16 https netmask
255.255.255.255
access-group inbound in interface tpfg

Thanks in advance

Correction..

access-list inbound permit tcp any interface tpfg eq https
static (inside,tpfg) tcp xx.xxx.xx.251 https 192.168.1.16 https netmask
255.255.255.255
access-group inbound in interface tpfg


"RG" <> wrote in message
news:4bfeb055$0$7594$...
> Is there a difference in the way you would configure PAT between versions
> 6.3 and 8?
>
> I have tried to use working configuration from 6.3, below, on 8.0 and it
> didn't work.
>
> access-list inbound extended permit tcp any interface natfg eq https
> static (inside,tpfg) tcp 96.57.168.251 https 192.168.1.16 https netmask
> 255.255.255.255
> access-group inbound in interface tpfg
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>

"RG" <> wrote in message
news:4bfeb206$0$4985$...
> Correction..
>
> access-list inbound permit tcp any interface tpfg eq https
> static (inside,tpfg) tcp xx.xxx.xx.251 https 192.168.1.16 https netmask
> 255.255.255.255
> access-group inbound in interface tpfg
>
>
> "RG" <> wrote in message
> news:4bfeb055$0$7594$...
>> Is there a difference in the way you would configure PAT between versions
>> 6.3 and 8?
>>
>> I have tried to use working configuration from 6.3, below, on 8.0 and it
>> didn't work.
>>
>> access-list inbound extended permit tcp any interface natfg eq https
>> static (inside,tpfg) tcp 96.57.168.251 https 192.168.1.16 https netmask
>> 255.255.255.255
>> access-group inbound in interface tpfg
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>

Nope, it's the same for that example.