«

On May 19, 2:16 pm, Peter Olcott <NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 12:50 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 19, 1:09 pm, "Pete Delgado"<Peter.Delg...@NoSpam.com> wrote:
> >> "Peter Olcott"<NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message
>
> >>> I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The
> >>> code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be added to
> >>> this design is the actual code the does the translation from UTF-8 to
> >>> UTF-32.
>
> >> I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th!
>
> >> -Pete
>
> > Maybe we can start a sucker's bet here?
>
> > I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims.
>
> > --
> > HLS
>
> You owe me fifty bucks Hector, I just posted the results of my working
> prototype that implements my patent claims.

Where? I don't see any code?

But there you go, you once again PROVED and SHOWED that this is all
about a lame, nefarious and unethical attempt to get your patent
claims disproved or substantiated which already has been shown in the
last 4 years to be of NO VALUE to anyone but yourself. One has to
ask, how were you even able to produce a patent without any working
example in the first place or code to begin with? It was all in your
mind.

People, don't feed this Patent Troll any more ideas

--
HLS

On May 19, 3:17 pm, Peter Olcott <NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:
> >>>> -Pete
>
> >>> Maybe we can start a sucker's bet here?
>
> >>> I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims.
>
> >>> --
> >>> HLS
>
> >> You owe me fifty bucks Hector, I just posted the results of my working
> >> prototype that implements my patent claims.
>
> > Where? I don't see any code?
>
> http://www.XXXXXXXXX.com/Unique.html

That link has nothing to do with this new vapor ware C/C++ UTF-8,
UTF-32 compiler development.

> You don't get to see the code, that is proprietary.

Then you didn't show any ****ING CODE you ****ING MORON!

The sucker bet is still on - $50 that PEDRO does not produce any code
representing his claims or any other claim..

> Even if the results on this link are faked (they are not) it still is something that I
> produced that represents my claims.

They are unproven inforrmatin until you can show independent
reproduceable results by actually running CODE outside your
possession. As far as we know, you produced this OCR result with
borrowed code from some other OCR development kit.. You have shown
nothing that proves otherwise.

And move over, where is this universal C/C++ language compiler?

--
HLS

On May 19, 3:57 pm, Peter Olcott <NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:

> The terms of the bet (immediately above) did not stipulate this
> requirement, are you welching on your bet?

No, it was based on the your original claim shown:

"I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8
recognizer. The
code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be
added to
this design is the actual code the does the translation from
UTF-8 to
UTF-32."

and Mr Delgado stating he will be looking forward to seeing it on the
27th:

http://groups.google.com/group/micro...41ac7e99d6e169

The sucker bet is you producing this "code" in one week that reflects
your claim for a UTF-8 recognizer. What you showed is nothing an
updated image and text of an 4 years old marketing link. It can easily
be hype for a non-existing process. In fact, here is a URL to show
how easy it to make an unsubstantiated claim:

http://opensite.winserver.com/fake/unique.html

This shows you proved nothing but spill marketing hype with an output
illusion for a unproven process.

--
HLS

"Peter Olcott" <> wrote in message
news: ...
> I will give you one more break since I already won the bet, thus can't owe
> you anything no matter what. You don't have to actually pay me, and I will
> not consider it to be welching unless I fail to provide the code that I
> said I would provide within the timeframe that Pete Delgato said I should
> provide it:
>
> "I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th!"

Peter,
*I* did not specify the timeframe, you did when you stated:

>" I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8 recognizer. The
>code will follow within a week."

I merely specified the date that I would attempt to look for your code here
which allows you a full seven days to produce the code and post it.


-Pete

It doesn't matter whether it was for your moronic C/C++ claims or
your moronic OCR/DFA claims. Its the same crap. You have never
proven any claim you made - anyway, anything. You proved nothing but
continue to show how much an unethical pathetic liar you are. Anyone
make any claim like you done all based on your words only with no
proof or evidence for any real product or process behind the scene
just like I repeated here:

http://opensite.winserver.com/fake/unique.html

The sucker bet is still on $50 for real proof of any actual PROCESS or
MODEL or DEMO demonstrating your ANY CLAIM THAT YOU MADE IN THESE
THREADS. FAKE WEB PAGES DO NOT COUNT.

--
HLS

On May 19, 10:56 pm, Peter Olcott <NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 8:08 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 19, 3:57 pm, Peter Olcott<NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:
>
> >> The terms of the bet (immediately above) did not stipulate this
> >> requirement, are you welching on your bet?
>
> > No, it was based on the your original claim shown:
>
> > "I just posted the complete detailed design of the UTF-8
> > recognizer. The
> > code will follow within a week. The only thing that needs to be
> > added to
> > this design is the actual code the does the translation from
> > UTF-8 to
> > UTF-32."
>
> > and Mr Delgado stating he will be looking forward to seeing it on the
> > 27th:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/micro...msg/6241ac7e99...
>
> > The sucker bet is you producing this "code" in one week that reflects
> > your claim for a UTF-8 recognizer.
>
> >>>>> I got $50 bucks on NEVER producing anything representing his claims.
>
> The specific terms of the bet did not make these stipulations that you
> are now later adding, so technically these later limitations are
> invalid. I will grant some of these stipulations to you anyway.
>
> Again I still win the bet even with these new terms making the claims
> apply to a UTF-8 recognizer. I have already produced "something"
> (software design) that perfectly meets the the terms of the bet
> "anything" and it does represent my claims about a UTF-8 recognizer.
>
> I will give you one more break since I already won the bet, thus can't
> owe you anything no matter what. You don't have to actually pay me, and
> I will not consider it to be welching unless I fail to provide the code
> that I said I would provide within the timeframe that Pete Delgato said
> I should provide it:
>
> "I'll be happy to look for the code on the 27th!"
>
> > What you showed is nothing an
> > updated image and text of an 4 years old marketing link. It can easily
> > be hype for a non-existing process. In fact, here is a URL to show
> > how easy it to make an unsubstantiated claim:
>
> > http://opensite.winserver.com/fake/unique.html
>
> > This shows you proved nothing but spill marketing hype with an output
> > illusion for a unproven process.
>
> > --
> > HLS