«

On Sun, 09 May 2010 21:55:54 +0000, Lewis writ:

> I won't pretend this is perfect, but it replicates your top menu without
> using HTML3, validates to HTML4 strict, doesn't use tables, and
> collapses pretty well.

Almost validates. You missed a form tag somewhere.

> I only did the top menu area, but the bones should be there enough to
> get you started in the right direction.
>
> I don't claim this is perfect [...]

> <http://home.kreme.comcsspo.html>

Not bad, but I can't see where this:

<http://i40.tinypic.com/2udxs1i.png> (your re-write)

is an improvement over this:

<http://i43.tinypic.com/rsbkeq.png> (my re-write)

>> It would seem that for that page using tables for layout is much
>> simpler, or what do you think?
>
> Using table for layout is simple until you want to change something,
> then you are basically starting over.

Yup. Nested tables are a lot of work, and usually unnecessarily so.

However, I'm starting to think that using tables for layout is easier
than convincing other people to *stop* using tables for layout.
--
⁂ "Because all you of Earth are idiots!"
¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·-> ※freemont※ <-·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯