"monkeywintest" <> wrote in message
news:27c8bcd6-fca4-4150-a190-...
Ferd.Berfle wrote:
> "???hw??f" <> wrote in message
> news:hpg56q$8fn$...
> > In message <2JJun.53242$2>, Aardvark wrote:
> >> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:48:59 -0400, Ferd.Berfle wrote:
> >>
> >> > "§nühw?,?£f" <> wrote in message
> >> > news:Xns9D519E3A9D43Esnuhwolfyahoocom@216.196.97.1 42...
> >> >> Same tactics, different war. Slaughter some civvies and then try and
> >> >> cover up the mess...
> >> >>
> >> >> ...the U.S. military has finally admitted what reports in the UK
> >> >> press
> >> >> -- and precious few U.S. outlets -- revealed weeks ago: a botched
> >> >> raid
> >> >> involving U.S. Special Forces in February left three Afghan women
> >> >> dead,
> >> >> two of whom were pregnant.
> >> >>
> >> >> "After initially denying involvement or any cover-up in the deaths
> >> >> of
> >> >> three Afghan women during a badly bungled American Special
> >> >> Operations
> >> >> assault in February, the American-led military command in Kabul
> >> >> admitted late on Sunday that its forces had, in fact, killed the
> >> >> women
> >> >> during the nighttime raid," the New York Times reported Monday.
> >> >>
> >> >> According to officials, Afghan-led investigators discovered grisly
> >> >> signs of an attempted cover up, including seven out of some 11
> >> >> bullets
> >> >> fired in the raid, reportedly retrieved from the bodies of the
> >> >> victims.
> >> >> According to the Times of London, which was the first to report the
> >> >> women's deaths, "U.S. special forces soldiers dug bullets out of
> >> >> their
> >> >> victims' bodies in the bloody aftermath . then washed the wounds
> >> >> with
> >> >> alcohol before lying to their superiors about what happened."
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new.../article708763
> >> >> 7.ece
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > So?
> >>
> >> So you've just proved once again (as if further proof were really
> >> needed)
> >> what kind of low-life pond scum you really are.
> >>
> > Whadda youse expect from a k00k that thins this:
> > "Reuters isn't the only news orgnization that had employees
> > collaborating
> > with the militants. Unfortunately many of them got away."
> >
> > ROTFPMSL! So the media is conspiring against the US military with the
> > insurgency?
> >
> > BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> >
> >
> You two functionally illiterate asswipes are great for your positive
> reviews
> of Hadji tripe from the Londonistan Times. The crap is even less
> believeable
> than the halfasst global warming crap you post.
Last I looked the republicans lied us into Iraq, last I checked nobody
is perfect. If you want to deny wrongs
across the board then what is new. But we are seeking the better by
exposing the worse. I know the entire Republican party doesn't
understand how that 'simple concept' works but it's tried and true.
Proven to create a better tomorrow.
WTF is all the party babble about?
Similar Threads
