On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:41:55 -0000, "ian field"
<> wrote:
>
>"Harry" <> wrote in message
>news:...
>>
>>
>> "Jordon" <jordon@REMOVE~THISmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
>> news:hne6ij$9fv$...
>>> ian field wrote:
>>>> It was recently announced on the news that Royal Mail are going to
>>>> abolish
>>>> the limit they imposed on un-addressed junk mail they delivered to each
>>>> household.
>>>>
>>>> So as well as the greedy b*stards at RM ripping people off with
>>>> outragous
>>>> charges for collecting revenues on overseas mail, they're now going to
>>>> cash
>>>> in to the max on unsolicited un-addressed junk mail.
>>>>
>>>> The obvious and only solution to this problem is to save up the junk
>>>> mail
>>>> untill you have a carrier bag full, then cram it into the nearest red
>>>> pillar
>>>> box.
>>>
>>> How does unaddressed mail get delivered?
>>
>> By the Royal Mail.
>>
>> That's the problem.
>
>In the UK you can also register with the Mailing Preference Service, but
>that has no effect on the un-addressed junk mail.
>
>Apparently you can put a sign on the letterbox politely declining junk mail,
>but for the time being I'm just as happy to punish RM.
>
>Recently I ordered an electronic project kit from a company in Aus'. RM
>ripped me off an £8 handling charge for collecting £3 VAT for the revenue.
>
>I'm open to suggestions of any way I can damage RM's profits without fear of
>legal consequences.
>
And I still think the US postal is terrible, sounds like you guys got
it bad too.
|