In article
<017ed27b-523b-4fc2-b931-
m>,
"Roy A." <> wrote:
> On 26 Feb, 22:28, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article
> > <8f6288d3-944c-418d-b532-a6925c087...@k34g2000yqh.googlegroups.co
> > m>,
> > *"Roy A." <royarnes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 26 Feb, 11:26, "Andy" <a...@NOSPAMmanyplay.com> wrote:
> > > > "jason" <jason.mell...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > Was my brief suggestion earlier in the thread no good? A little
> > cockroach to be squashed and ignored by following long posts by
> > Andy and now this? <g>
>
> There is a difference in the table height algorithm from CSS 2 to CSS
> 2.1.
>
> In CSS 2 you your solution works, but not with CSS 2.1. It dosn't work
> in Firefox 3.5.8 for linux. I don't know about Windows or Mac.
You did not warn people who might be fooled by my foolish
mistakes! There are people who are easily misled. It is your duty.
<http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/tablehigh.html>
So, you are seeing what I am not seeing in any of my Mac
browsers, the FF version you mention, many of the other browsers,
some the latest, some decrepit like Mac IE5, and just a minute,
let me turn on my winbox. Yes, same in IE7 and 6. So, FF on Linux
has not caught up with 2.1?
--
dorayme
|