«

JonC <> wrote in
news::

>
>
> Ihave OS win7 and I use a Epson sx215 printer.
> When I print out photos using the print photos programme built into
> windows, the photos print out of a good quality.
> But when I print out photos using my two editing programmes, Faststone
> and Photoscape they are of inferior quality ie fuzzy with poor colours.
> Why is this? Can anyone advise please?

1. What type of files are the originals? jpeg maybe?

2. What type of files do the other programs print?

when you convert from a jpeg to another type of file, every time you do it
you lose image quality and information. Aside from knowing any more
information that's the best bet.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Evan Platt <evan@*******************************> wrote in
news::

> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:15:23 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <>
> wrote:
>
>>1. What type of files are the originals? jpeg maybe?
>
> Does that matter?
>
>>2. What type of files do the other programs print?
>
> Huh?
>
>>when you convert from a jpeg to another type of file, every time you
>>do it you lose image quality and information. Aside from knowing any
>>more information that's the best bet.
>
> Where did the OP mention converting anything?

He didn't, but it's typical behavior for such programs. Your explanation,
while special in your own way, doesn't actually say anything. Mine does.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Evan Platt <evan@*******************************> wrote in
news::

> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:59:22 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <>
> wrote:
>
>>He didn't, but it's typical behavior for such programs.
>
> Huh? You asked about converting JPG's. Which isn't typical behavior.
>
>>Your explanation,
>
> Solution. Not explanation. Learn the difference.
>
>>while special in your own way, doesn't actually say anything. Mine does.
>
> I gave a potential solution. You asked questions irrelevant to what
> the OP asked. But we'll see, when the OP comes back and states that my
> solution led to a resolution, you'll go back under your bridge only to
> come back and tell someone to format their hard drive.

Riight Dan C. Or do you not want people to know?

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:09:48 +0000, chuckcar wrote:

> Evan Platt <evan@*******************************> wrote in
> news::
>
>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:59:22 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>He didn't, but it's typical behavior for such programs.
>>
>> Huh? You asked about converting JPG's. Which isn't typical behavior.
>>
>>>Your explanation,
>>
>> Solution. Not explanation. Learn the difference.
>>
>>>while special in your own way, doesn't actually say anything. Mine
>>>does.
>>
>> I gave a potential solution. You asked questions irrelevant to what the
>> OP asked. But we'll see, when the OP comes back and states that my
>> solution led to a resolution, you'll go back under your bridge only to
>> come back and tell someone to format their hard drive.
>
> Riight Dan C. Or do you not want people to know?

Huh?


--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he slipped his date a Purple Microdot.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/obama_thanks.jpg

On 16 Feb 2010 03:18:16 GMT, Dan C wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:09:48 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>
>> Evan Platt <evan@*******************************> wrote in
>> news::
>>
>>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:59:22 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>He didn't, but it's typical behavior for such programs.
>>>
>>> Huh? You asked about converting JPG's. Which isn't typical behavior.
>>>
>>>>Your explanation,
>>>
>>> Solution. Not explanation. Learn the difference.
>>>
>>>>while special in your own way, doesn't actually say anything. Mine
>>>>does.
>>>
>>> I gave a potential solution. You asked questions irrelevant to what the
>>> OP asked. But we'll see, when the OP comes back and states that my
>>> solution led to a resolution, you'll go back under your bridge only to
>>> come back and tell someone to format their hard drive.
>>
>> Riight Dan C. Or do you not want people to know?
>
> Huh?


So much nicer not seeing a post by Evan.

For you Dan, Evan was making the remark that you should post your other
possible solution as well.
Let me guess. Reformat?

On Feb 16, 12:37*am, Evan Platt <e...@*******************************>
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:15:23 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <ch...@nil.car>
> wrote:
>
> >1. What type of files are the originals? jpeg maybe?
>
> Does that matter?
>
> >2. What type of files do the other programs print?
>
> Huh?
>
> >when you convert from a jpeg to another type of file, every time you do it
> >you lose image quality and information. Aside from knowing any more
> >information that's the best bet.
>
> Where did the OP mention converting anything?
> --
> To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

PSP changes the photo format to .psp which is not particularly world-
wide. Ergo, the OP may have changed them ...like normal folk do. An
obvious query is to ask what format the original pix were. .....and
before you scream, "Who mentioned PSP? I did. OK?
Because chuckcar had the "blatant audacity" to attempt to help...you
got ****ed! Behave, boy.

sandy58 <> wrote in
news:e48c88b1-cd7c-4ef6-b8bb-:

> On Feb 16, 12:37*am, Evan Platt <e...@*******************************>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:15:23 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <ch...@nil.car>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >1. What type of files are the originals? jpeg maybe?
>>
>> Does that matter?
>>
>> >2. What type of files do the other programs print?
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> >when you convert from a jpeg to another type of file, every time you
>> >do
> it
>> >you lose image quality and information. Aside from knowing any more
>> >information that's the best bet.

> PSP changes the photo format to .psp which is not particularly world-
> wide. Ergo, the OP may have changed them ...like normal folk do. An
> obvious query is to ask what format the original pix were. .....and
> before you scream, "Who mentioned PSP? I did. OK?
> Because chuckcar had the "blatant audacity" to attempt to help...you
> got ****ed! Behave, boy.
>

I neither made no attempt nor had any interest in helping Evan. My personal
opinion is that that's impossible anyways. My post was directed at Jon, after
which Evan did his standard room temperature IQ troll: deny the veracity of
anything I say, even if he said the exact same thing last week. After which
question every conclusion.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

On Feb 17, 9:48*pm, chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> wrote:
> sandy58 <alecki...@googlemail.com> wrote innews:e48c88b1-cd7c-4ef6-b8bb-:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 12:37*am, Evan Platt <e...@*******************************>
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:15:23 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <ch...@nil.car>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >1. What type of files are the originals? jpeg maybe?
>
> >> Does that matter?
>
> >> >2. What type of files do the other programs print?
>
> >> Huh?
>
> >> >when you convert from a jpeg to another type of file, every time you
> >> >do
> > it
> >> >you lose image quality and information. Aside from knowing any more
> >> >information that's the best bet.
> > PSP changes the photo format to .psp which is not particularly world-
> > wide. Ergo, the OP may have changed them ...like normal folk do. An
> > obvious query is to ask what format the original pix were. .....and
> > before you scream, "Who mentioned PSP? I did. OK?
> > Because chuckcar had the "blatant audacity" to attempt to help...you
> > got ****ed! Behave, boy.
>
> I neither made no attempt nor had any interest in helping Evan. My personal
> opinion is that that's impossible anyways. My post was directed at Jon, after
> which Evan did his standard room temperature IQ troll: deny the veracity of
> anything I say, even if he said the exact same thing last week. After which
> question every conclusion.
>
> --
> (setq (chuck nil) *car(chuck) )

If you read my post again, chuckcar, the "to help...you got ****ed"
and whole message was direct to Ever A Pratt.