Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Computer Support > The truth about Martin Luther King

Reply
Thread Tools

The truth about Martin Luther King

 
 
Dead Ted
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-20-2010
On Jan 19, 3:51 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Jan 19 2010 4:01 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:
>
> > On Jan 19 2010 2:00 PM, Dead Ted wrote:

>
> > > The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

>
> > Racist

>
> I didn't read the guy's post - just scrolled through quickly. I don't
> know if what he said, and the references he quoted, about MLK are true or
> not. And I seriously doubt that you do either.


I would welcome you to examine the facts for yourself because
I know you'll draw the same conclusions. These facts are buried
because a Judge sealed MLK's records for 50 years. They won't
be available until 2027.

"Charles D. Brennan, retired Assistant Director of the FBI, stated
that he had personally been involved in the FBI surveillance of King
and knew from first-hand observation the truth about King's sexual
conduct --- conduct that Mr. Brennan characterized as "orgiastic and
adulterous escapades, some of which indicated that King could be
bestial in his sexual abuse of women."

You just saw that it was
> not flattering to MKL so you immediately call the guy "racist". Much
> easier to post a one word insult that to actually respond to the claims he
> makes. But here's my question for you bucko. If (and I say if) the facts
> he stated about MLK were true, does that still make him a "racist"?


http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles.html

"On Jan. 31, 1977 Coretta Scott King obtained a federal court order
sealing for 50 years 845 pages of FBI records about her husband,
"because its release would destroy his reputation!"

Still Congress voted to make King's birthday a national holiday.

Are these factual revelations racism?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
richard
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-20-2010
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:48:26 -0800 (PST), Dead Ted wrote:

> On Jan 19, 3:51 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>> On Jan 19 2010 4:01 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 19 2010 2:00 PM, Dead Ted wrote:

>>
>>> > The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

>>
>>> Racist

>>
>> I didn't read the guy's post - just scrolled through quickly. I don't
>> know if what he said, and the references he quoted, about MLK are true or
>> not. And I seriously doubt that you do either.

>
> I would welcome you to examine the facts for yourself because
> I know you'll draw the same conclusions. These facts are buried
> because a Judge sealed MLK's records for 50 years. They won't
> be available until 2027.
>
> "Charles D. Brennan, retired Assistant Director of the FBI, stated
> that he had personally been involved in the FBI surveillance of King
> and knew from first-hand observation the truth about King's sexual
> conduct --- conduct that Mr. Brennan characterized as "orgiastic and
> adulterous escapades, some of which indicated that King could be
> bestial in his sexual abuse of women."
>
> You just saw that it was
>> not flattering to MKL so you immediately call the guy "racist". Much
>> easier to post a one word insult that to actually respond to the claims he
>> makes. But here's my question for you bucko. If (and I say if) the facts
>> he stated about MLK were true, does that still make him a "racist"?

>
> http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles.html
>
> "On Jan. 31, 1977 Coretta Scott King obtained a federal court order
> sealing for 50 years 845 pages of FBI records about her husband,
> "because its release would destroy his reputation!"
>
> Still Congress voted to make King's birthday a national holiday.
>
> Are these factual revelations racism?


Something even a more peculiar about the man.
Seems he might not be legally entitled to the name.
Daddy, announced to his congregation, "I shall henceforth be known as
Martin Luther King Senior."
Question is now, did the man legally change his name, and his son's, as
required by state law?

The holiday was born amidst the hullabaloo of the era of "Affirmative
Action" purely to appease the blacks.

Ask a 10 year old black kid who the man was and what he was all about, and
you'll most likely get the response of, "Who?".


Now of course Evan Platt will come along and say I'm being racist.
Simply because I dare talk about "blacks".
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
§ñühw¤£f
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-20-2010
In message <e07a7f1f-0ad6-4555-92a4->,
Dead Ted wrote:
> On Jan 19, 3:51 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > On Jan 19 2010 4:01 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 19 2010 2:00 PM, Dead Ted wrote:

> >
> > > > The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

> >
> > > Racist

> >
> > I didn't read the guy's post - just scrolled through quickly. I don't
> > know if what he said, and the references he quoted, about MLK are true or
> > not. And I seriously doubt that you do either.

>
> I would welcome you to examine the facts for yourself because
> I know you'll draw the same conclusions. These facts are buried
> because a Judge sealed MLK's records for 50 years. They won't
> be available until 2027.
>
> "Charles D. Brennan, retired Assistant Director of the FBI, stated
> that he had personally been involved in the FBI surveillance of King
> and knew from first-hand observation the truth about King's sexual
> conduct --- conduct that Mr. Brennan characterized as "orgiastic and
> adulterous escapades, some of which indicated that King could be
> bestial in his sexual abuse of women."
>
> You just saw that it was
> > not flattering to MKL so you immediately call the guy "racist". Much
> > easier to post a one word insult that to actually respond to the claims he
> > makes. But here's my question for you bucko. If (and I say if) the facts
> > he stated about MLK were true, does that still make him a "racist"?

>
> http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles.html
>
> "On Jan. 31, 1977 Coretta Scott King obtained a federal court order
> sealing for 50 years 845 pages of FBI records about her husband,
> "because its release would destroy his reputation!"
>
> Still Congress voted to make King's birthday a national holiday.
>
> Are these factual revelations racism?


Obviously, you brain dead racist ****nuckle. Scroll to the bottom of the page
and you see that its hosted by this:
http://www.stormfront.org/

Now, cRaZy cRaCkEr, as you were saying?

^_^

--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
Cash for *who*?
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/

 
Reply With Quote
 
Dead Ted
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-24-2010
On Jan 20, 4:45*pm, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@netscape.net> wrote:
> In message <e07a7f1f-0ad6-4555-92a4-8d4c6ac63...@22g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -Dead Ted wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 3:51 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > > On Jan 19 2010 4:01 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:

>
> > > > On Jan 19 2010 2:00 PM, Dead Ted wrote:

>
> > > > > TheTruthAbout "MartinLutherKing, Jr."

>
> > > > Racist

>
> > > I didn't read the guy's post - just scrolled through quickly. *I don't
> > > know if what he said, and the references he quoted, about MLK are true or
> > > not. *And I seriously doubt that you do either.

>
> > I would welcome you to examine the facts for yourself because
> > I know you'll draw the same conclusions. These facts are buried
> > because a Judge sealed MLK's records for 50 years. They won't
> > be available until 2027.

>
> > "Charles D. Brennan, retired Assistant Director of the FBI, stated
> > that he had personally been involved in the FBI surveillance ofKing
> > and knew from first-hand observation thetruthaboutKing'ssexual
> > conduct --- conduct that Mr. Brennan characterized as "orgiastic and
> > adulterous escapades, some of which indicated thatKingcould be
> > bestial in his sexual abuse of women."

>
> > *You just saw that it was
> > > not flattering to MKL so you immediately call the guy "racist". *Much
> > > easier to post a one word insult that to actually respond to the claims he
> > > makes. *But here's my question for you bucko. *If (and I say if) the facts
> > > he stated about MLK were true, does that still make him a "racist"?

>
> >http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles.html

>
> > "On Jan. 31, 1977 Coretta ScottKingobtained a federal court order
> > sealing for 50 years 845 pages of FBI records about her husband,
> > "because its release would destroy his reputation!"

>
> > Still Congress voted to makeKing'sbirthday a national holiday.

>
> > Are these factual *revelations racism?

>
> Obviously, you brain dead racist ****nuckle. Scroll to the bottom of the page
> and you see that its hosted by this:http://www.stormfront.org/
>
> Now, cRaZy cRaCkEr, as you were saying?


100% fact no matter who happens to own the website.

Does the NY Daily News suit you better?


The director of a forthcoming movie about Martin Luther King Jr. has
vowed he won't show him in bed with a prostitute.

For months now, King's family has been nervous about "Selma." Produced
by Brad Pitt and "Slumdog Millionaire" Oscar-winner Christian Colson,
the project's script portrays King (r.) as the tireless martyr of
America's civil rights movement. But Paul Webb's screenplay also shows
him to be a flesh-and-blood man who had, as his colleague Ralph
Abernathy wrote, a "weakness for women."

In one scene, President Lyndon Johnson tells FBI director J. Edgar
Hoover that he doesn't know or care "whether [King] has a gargantuan
appetite for p- or whether he just sometimes needs a woman's touch
when he's away from home ..."

In another scene at a Washington hotel, King meets a flirtatious woman
who tells him, "You look like you need some tender loving care,
honey."

"You're way out of my price bracket," says King.

"I'll donate part of my fee to the cause," she says.

Soon thereafter, Hoover's agents are seen recording King's lovemaking
with the woman, as well as their postcoital conversation. King's wife,
Coretta, receives a copy of the tape, with an anonymous blackmail
letter.

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/20...h_prostit.html

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interview with Martin F. Krafft, Author of "The Debian System" at XYZ Computing Silverstrand Front Page News 0 01-20-2006 02:48 AM
King King DVD - which poster? janey3white@yahoo.com DVD Video 4 11-23-2005 04:32 PM
DVD Verdict reviews: ALONE IN THE DARK, MARTIN LUTHER KING: "I HAVE A DREAM", and more! DVD Verdict DVD Video 0 05-20-2005 08:11 AM
martin amarchini@telpin.com.ar Cisco 0 01-14-2005 04:27 PM
Luther Blisset Jonathan Gennick Python 5 10-20-2004 07:06 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57