On Jan 20, 4:45*pm, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@netscape.net> wrote:
> In message <e07a7f1f-0ad6-4555-92a4-8d4c6ac63...@22g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -Dead Ted wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 3:51 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > > On Jan 19 2010 4:01 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 19 2010 2:00 PM, Dead Ted wrote:
>
> > > > > TheTruthAbout "MartinLutherKing, Jr."
>
> > > > Racist
>
> > > I didn't read the guy's post - just scrolled through quickly. *I don't
> > > know if what he said, and the references he quoted, about MLK are true or
> > > not. *And I seriously doubt that you do either.
>
> > I would welcome you to examine the facts for yourself because
> > I know you'll draw the same conclusions. These facts are buried
> > because a Judge sealed MLK's records for 50 years. They won't
> > be available until 2027.
>
> > "Charles D. Brennan, retired Assistant Director of the FBI, stated
> > that he had personally been involved in the FBI surveillance ofKing
> > and knew from first-hand observation thetruthaboutKing'ssexual
> > conduct --- conduct that Mr. Brennan characterized as "orgiastic and
> > adulterous escapades, some of which indicated thatKingcould be
> > bestial in his sexual abuse of women."
>
> > *You just saw that it was
> > > not flattering to MKL so you immediately call the guy "racist". *Much
> > > easier to post a one word insult that to actually respond to the claims he
> > > makes. *But here's my question for you bucko. *If (and I say if) the facts
> > > he stated about MLK were true, does that still make him a "racist"?
>
> >http://www.martinlutherking.org/articles.html
>
> > "On Jan. 31, 1977 Coretta ScottKingobtained a federal court order
> > sealing for 50 years 845 pages of FBI records about her husband,
> > "because its release would destroy his reputation!"
>
> > Still Congress voted to makeKing'sbirthday a national holiday.
>
> > Are these factual *revelations racism?
>
> Obviously, you brain dead racist ****nuckle. Scroll to the bottom of the page
> and you see that its hosted by this:http://www.stormfront.org/
>
> Now, cRaZy cRaCkEr, as you were saying?
100% fact no matter who happens to own the website.
Does the NY Daily News suit you better?
The director of a forthcoming movie about Martin Luther King Jr. has
vowed he won't show him in bed with a prostitute.
For months now, King's family has been nervous about "Selma." Produced
by Brad Pitt and "Slumdog Millionaire" Oscar-winner Christian Colson,
the project's script portrays King (r.) as the tireless martyr of
America's civil rights movement. But Paul Webb's screenplay also shows
him to be a flesh-and-blood man who had, as his colleague Ralph
Abernathy wrote, a "weakness for women."
In one scene, President Lyndon Johnson tells FBI director J. Edgar
Hoover that he doesn't know or care "whether [King] has a gargantuan
appetite for p- or whether he just sometimes needs a woman's touch
when he's away from home ..."
In another scene at a Washington hotel, King meets a flirtatious woman
who tells him, "You look like you need some tender loving care,
honey."
"You're way out of my price bracket," says King.
"I'll donate part of my fee to the cause," she says.
Soon thereafter, Hoover's agents are seen recording King's lovemaking
with the woman, as well as their postcoital conversation. King's wife,
Coretta, receives a copy of the tape, with an anonymous blackmail
letter.
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/20...h_prostit.html