«

In message <d20f1986-
c684-49b1-96bc->, thingy wrote:

> Is there such a thing?
>
> I have some old 2000 books but want to study up a bit on the newer
> 2003 AD.

So Marvel have a sequel to their “2000 AD� comics, then?

> > I have some old 2000 books but want to study up a bit on the newer
> > 2003 AD.
>
> So Marvel have a sequel to their “2000 AD” comics, then?

Wash your mouth out, the galaxy's greatest comic does not come from
Marvel. I'd watch out for Rigellian hotshots.

On Dec 9, 11:56*am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
> In message <d20f1986-
>
> c684-49b1-96bc-5c58fc4f0...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, thingy wrote:
> > Is there such a thing?
>
> > I have some old 2000 books but want to study up a bit on the newer
> > 2003 AD.
>
> So Marvel have a sequel to their “2000 AD” comics, then?

2000AD isnt Marvel....

regards

Thing

On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:44:06 +1300, Enkidu wrote:

>> Yes - exactly so - active-directory compatible. That means a DC doing
>> the identical stuff - performing identically.
>>
> I'm not going to get drawn into a long-running Lennier scrambled ramble.
> Suffice it to say you are wrong (as always). Implementing an AD
> compatible DC is a long way from providing a full AD replacement
> capability.

If you can get non-Microsoft domain controllers controlling an Active Directory domain in a manner that
is fully compatible in all respects including trust relationships with Microsoft's own implementation of
Active Directory how is that not providing a full AD replacement capability?

I'm curious to know why you think that should not be the case given the stated aims of the Samba
project:

http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/FAQ


Cheers

--
"Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean"

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:00:37 +0000, Carnations wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:44:06 +1300, Enkidu wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm curious to know why you think that should not be the case given the
> stated aims of the Samba project:
>
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/FAQ
>
>
> Cheers

I feel sorry for you cliff ...


BiggleZZZ

Carnations wrote:

> I'm curious to know why you think that should not be the case given the stated aims of the Samba
> project:

An aim and the reality are normally two totally different things.

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:27:12 +1300, EMB wrote:

> Carnations wrote:
>
>> I'm curious to know why you think that should not be the case given the
>> stated aims of the Samba project:
>
> An aim and the reality are normally two totally different things.

I would suggest that an aim, and the PRESENT reality may be two different things.

It appears to me that the Samba project is actively working on Samba 4, and that they have a published
list of very specific things they need to accomplish. That says to me that they fully know their roadmap
and fully intend to achieve it.

Also, they have access to all of Microsoft's documentation and access to the technical team within
Microsoft that is maintaining AD (altho' they are doing clean-room development still).


--
"Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean"

In message <82888087-83d5-453b-
af4d->, AD. wrote:

> Hehe - Would you also recommend studying MS Office by reading the Open
> Office docs?

Yeah, why not? Stick to the features that work with both, and you can’t go
wrong.