Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Wireless Networking > Wireless Router Security

Reply
Thread Tools

Wireless Router Security

 
 
Lone Star
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-05-2009
OK, simple question: do I really need to set up WEP or WPA security for my
Linksys WRT 54GS if the closest public point to my property is around 500
feet away? I plan on broadcasting my SSID likewise.

I'm thinking, perhaps mistakenly, that the speed to my home computers
(wireless) will be faster without the encryption. Comments? Thanks.

EW


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
john
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-05-2009
Lone Star wrote:
> OK, simple question: do I really need to set up WEP or WPA security for my
> Linksys WRT 54GS if the closest public point to my property is around 500
> feet away? I plan on broadcasting my SSID likewise.
>
> I'm thinking, perhaps mistakenly, that the speed to my home computers
> (wireless) will be faster without the encryption. Comments? Thanks.
>
> EW
>
>

WPA is more secure with out question.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Lem
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-05-2009
Lone Star wrote:
> OK, simple question: do I really need to set up WEP or WPA security for my
> Linksys WRT 54GS if the closest public point to my property is around 500
> feet away? I plan on broadcasting my SSID likewise.
>
> I'm thinking, perhaps mistakenly, that the speed to my home computers
> (wireless) will be faster without the encryption. Comments? Thanks.
>
> EW
>
>


By all means broadcast your SSID. Disabling SSID broadcast does not
provide any meaningful security and may cause problems.
http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/ar...ess-ssids.aspx

Although the nominal max outdoor range for 802.11G is around 300 feet,
it's possible that the signal from your router could be picked up from
farther away than that by someone with a high-gain directional antenna.

While there may be some speed loss when using encryption, particularly
with older equipment, in general it will be hardly detectable. You are
far more likely to have noticeable speed loss based on signal strength
(e.g., walls/floors between your router and your computer).

And unless you are transmitting large files, e.g, streaming video, from
one computer on your LAN to another, your data transfer rate will be
limited by your Internet connection unless you have super-premium cable
service.

In the end, you have to decide whether you want to milk that last few
bps out of the connection in exchange for the risk, however small, of
someone accessing your system. If I had a 500-foot perimeter around my
house, I'd still encrypt my wireless network.

--
Lem

Apollo 11 - 40 years ago:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ap...0th/index.html
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jack [MVP-Networking]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-05-2009
While early WEP might slow down and create some other difficulties, WPA is
almost neutral.
Thus No point to Risk your system even if the probably that someone around
would log to your system is low.
From the weakest to the strongest, Wireless security capacity is.
No Security
Switching Off SSID (same has No Security. SSID can be easily sniffed even if
it is Off)
MAC Filtering______(Band Aid if nothing else is available, MAC number can be
easily Spoofed).
WEP64____(Easy, to "Break" by knowledgeable people).
WEP128___(A little Harder, but "Hackable" too).
-------------------
The three above are Not considered safe.
Safe Starts here at WPA.
-------------------
WPA-PSK__(Very Hard to Break).
WPA-AES__(Not functionally Breakable)
WPA2____ (Not functionally Breakable).
Note 1: WPA-AES the the current entry level rendition of WPA2.
Note 2: If you use WinXP bellow SP3 and did not updated it, you would have
to download the WPA2 patch from Microsoft.
<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893357>
The documentation of your Wireless devices (Wireless Router, and Wireless
Computer's Card) should state the type of security that is available with
your Wireless hardware.
All devices MUST be set to the same security level using the same pass
phrase.
Therefore the security must be set according what ever is the best possible
of one of the Wireless devices.
I.e. even if most of your system might be capable to be configured to the
max. with WPA2, but one device is only capable to be configured to max . of
WEP, to whole system must be configured to WEP.
If you need more good security and one device (like a Wireless card that can
do WEP only) is holding better security for the whole Network, replace the
device with a better one.
Setting Wireless Security - http://www.ezlan.net/Wireless_Security.html
The Core differences between WEP, WPA, and WPA2 -
http://www.ezlan.net/wpa_wep.html
Jack (MVP-Networking).

"Lone Star" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:hfca9p$36d$(E-Mail Removed)...
> OK, simple question: do I really need to set up WEP or WPA security for my
> Linksys WRT 54GS if the closest public point to my property is around 500
> feet away? I plan on broadcasting my SSID likewise.
>
> I'm thinking, perhaps mistakenly, that the speed to my home computers
> (wireless) will be faster without the encryption. Comments? Thanks.
>
> EW
>
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Pavel A.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-05-2009

"Lone Star" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:hfca9p$36d$(E-Mail Removed)...
> OK, simple question: do I really need to set up WEP or WPA security for my
> Linksys WRT 54GS if the closest public point to my property is around 500
> feet away? I plan on broadcasting my SSID likewise.


A simple answer: you really want to secure your network, using the latest
and greatest techniques.
Yes, even you.

> I'm thinking, perhaps mistakenly, that the speed to my home computers
> (wireless) will be faster without the encryption. Comments? Thanks.


Well... here goes a bit longer reply:
The truth that wi-fi vendors don't want us to know is that certain protocols
used in WPA
are quite sensitive to timeouts and packet loss.
So, when the signal is weak (as at the limit of the coverage area), WPA can
become
fragile, to the degree noticeable by users.
With the recent "N" standard hardware, reception is much more robust, that
users
feel as faster connection and less interruptions.
So the complete answer is, the good security works better with the good
(newer, less cheap) hardware.

Regards,
--pa


 
Reply With Quote
 
Lone Star
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-05-2009

"Jack [MVP-Networking]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:uI$(E-Mail Removed)...
> While early WEP might slow down and create some other difficulties, WPA is
> almost neutral.
> Thus No point to Risk your system even if the probably that someone around
> would log to your system is low.

SNIP.............................................. ............................

Thanks to you and the others for the comments. As you all indicate, better
go for the security. I will. Thanks again.

EW


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Belkin N1 Wireless USB Adapter (F5D8051 ver 2010uk) and Channel 13. Notes on Pre-N Notebook card (F5D8010 ver 1001uk), Wireless G Notebook card (F5D7011 ver 1000uk) and Wireless G Plus router (F5D7231-4 ver 3000uk) John Wireless Networking 1 07-27-2009 08:41 AM
WIRELESS G BROADBAND ROUTER OR WIRELESS N BROADBAND ROUTER Bill Wireless Networking 2 05-28-2008 04:04 PM
Setting up a router with 29 Global IPs, BUT can't ping router internal interface from server or server interface from router war_wheelan@yahoo.com Cisco 1 12-14-2005 03:31 PM
Wireless Router-to-Router communications Steve Bruce, mct Wireless Networking 2 09-20-2004 12:21 PM
IT-Security, Security, e-security COMSOLIT Messmer Computer Support 0 09-05-2003 08:34 AM



Advertisments