Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > NZ Computing > Failed LCD monitor

Reply
Thread Tools

Failed LCD monitor

 
 
Mary Hanna
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-01-2009
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:58:26 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>(E-Mail Removed) says...
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:27:25 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:10:42 -0800 (PST), John Little
>> >> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Nov 30, 12:47*pm, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> >> >> *Stick with the Consumer Garuantees Act. *Get
>> >> >
>> >> >CGA doesn't apply, I've claimed the GST, depreciated it, and so on.
>> >> >
>> >> >Regards, John
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> YES IT DOES, but then again Philips is know as not being a reliable product..
>> >
>> >No Mary, only if it is a retail purchase.

>>
>>
>> Then its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..

>
>Irrelevant - it is NOT covered by C(=Consumer)GA.



Seems that you cant read I will State again

Its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Dave Doe
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-01-2009
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:58:26 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:27:25 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> >> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:10:42 -0800 (PST), John Little
> >> >> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On Nov 30, 12:47*pm, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> >> >> *Stick with the Consumer Garuantees Act. *Get
> >> >> >
> >> >> >CGA doesn't apply, I've claimed the GST, depreciated it, and so on..
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Regards, John
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> YES IT DOES, but then again Philips is know as not being a reliable product..
> >> >
> >> >No Mary, only if it is a retail purchase.
> >>
> >>
> >> Then its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..

> >
> >Irrelevant - it is NOT covered by C(=Consumer)GA.

>
>
> Seems that you cant read I will State again
>
> Its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..


What IS your point?

Teh SOG will not help the OP. It provides very limited protection, and
can be contracted out of. Not only can it be - it is most likely -
*most* firms will provide a warranty along the lines:
"No other warranties either express or implied by law are made..." -
good-bye SOG.

So yer back to manufacturer warranty level.

--
Duncan.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Mary Hanna
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-01-2009
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:06:21 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>(E-Mail Removed) says...
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:58:26 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:27:25 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>> >> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:10:42 -0800 (PST), John Little
>> >> >> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >On Nov 30, 12:47*pm, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> >> >> >> *Stick with the Consumer Garuantees Act. *Get
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >CGA doesn't apply, I've claimed the GST, depreciated it, and so on.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Regards, John
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> YES IT DOES, but then again Philips is know as not being a reliable product..
>> >> >
>> >> >No Mary, only if it is a retail purchase.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Then its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..
>> >
>> >Irrelevant - it is NOT covered by C(=Consumer)GA.

>>
>>
>> Seems that you cant read I will State again
>>
>> Its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..

>
>What IS your point?
>
>Teh SOG will not help the OP. It provides very limited protection, and
>can be contracted out of. Not only can it be - it is most likely -
>*most* firms will provide a warranty along the lines:
>"No other warranties either express or implied by law are made..." -
>good-bye SOG.
>
>So yer back to manufacturer warranty level.




Seems to me you know so little..
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dave Doe
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-02-2009
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:06:21 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:58:26 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> >> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:27:25 +1300, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> >> >> >(E-Mail Removed) says...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:10:42 -0800 (PST), John Little
> >> >> >> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >On Nov 30, 12:47*pm, Dave Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> *Stick with the Consumer Garuantees Act. *Get
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >CGA doesn't apply, I've claimed the GST, depreciated it, and so on.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Regards, John
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> YES IT DOES, but then again Philips is know as not being a reliable product..
> >> >> >
> >> >> >No Mary, only if it is a retail purchase.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Then its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..
> >> >
> >> >Irrelevant - it is NOT covered by C(=Consumer)GA.
> >>
> >>
> >> Seems that you cant read I will State again
> >>
> >> Its covered by the Sales of Goods Act..

> >
> >What IS your point?
> >
> >Teh SOG will not help the OP. It provides very limited protection, and
> >can be contracted out of. Not only can it be - it is most likely -
> >*most* firms will provide a warranty along the lines:
> >"No other warranties either express or implied by law are made..." -
> >good-bye SOG.
> >
> >So yer back to manufacturer warranty level.

>
>
>
> Seems to me you know so little..


Suggest you stick to your *mainframe* - *Mary*.


--
Duncan.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Samsung 910MP LCD TV Monitor Review at XYZ Computing Silverstrand Front Page News 1 07-02-2005 06:04 PM
Canon powershot S1 LCD Vs Kodak DX6490 LCD?? Jason Digital Photography 3 06-07-2004 07:38 PM
Plastic cover for 2.5 inch LCD [like the cover comes to protect LCD of some DSLR] zxcvar Digital Photography 0 12-28-2003 03:52 PM
LCD monitor with TV Tuner or LCD TV with PC input? John Computer Information 0 12-18-2003 10:32 PM



Advertisments