The long term strategy is for America to incite cyber war with the
East. They want to use Cyber war and cyber terrorism to hold countries
to economic ransom if countries do not comply with political and
military objectives.
America will use the threat of shutting off critical infrastructure of
countries if political leaders don't agree to deals that America want
to make with others.
This (cyber war / cyber terrorism) is a far more clean cut and covert
'serious consequences' punishment than sending in the B-52's or
sending in CIA human assets on the ground to carry out over throw ops
against a government not complying with trade and industry deals
between governments in the east and west.
This what you see on media outlets is a secret war build up that is
due to be played out as soon as U.S intelligence are happy Obama has
done enough to secure cyber.
U.S can't carry out the ops it wants to carry out in the cyber domain
until its country has met a certain standard of cybersecurity which it
is currently not met.
The U.S can only carry out pocket attacks right now on small countries
such as Estonia, Georgia etc because U.S isn't fully secure yet to
defend a counter attack that would be expected against a cyber
offensive carried out by U.S.
The strategy is to make all attacks appear to be coming from Russia or
other enemy state of the U.S., the U.S are ininfiltrating computers of
those states, as well as covert ops by CIA to physically plant malcode
within major defence companies and technology makers.
The U.S are too scared to carry out a major cyber offensive right now
cause their cyber infrastructure security is poor, as soon as it isn't
U.S plan cyber attacks on major countries.
Because of the poor U.S cyber defense capability right now, U.S only
have limited cyber offensive capability, its all U.S have the gutts to
do right now until their cybersecurity is shored up.
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,10...105466o,00.htm
http://sites.google.com/site/n3td3v/