Theft Is Theft?

Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
<http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.

The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
“theft�. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet passes
on their accusations to the police, they don’t like it and accuse the ISP of
“not doing enough�.

Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
> <http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.
>
> The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
> ?theft?. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet
> passes on their accusations to the police, they don?t like it and accuse
> the ISP of ?not doing enough?.

There's been a little on the radio about ACTA recently.
Seems its full steam ahead with the Govt and its USFTA
wranglings. Doesn't bode well for the NZ ISPs.

http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4510/125/

http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/mou...ust-beginning/

Adam

Also this one, referred to by above,

http://coto2.wordpress.com/2009/11/0...-bad-very-bad/

Adam

On 2009-11-07, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <_zealand> wrote:
> Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
><http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.
>
> The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
> ?theft?. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet passes
> on their accusations to the police, they don?t like it and accuse the ISP of
> ?not doing enough?.

Who are they? The media, et al

Gordon

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:59:48 +1300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<_zealand> wrote:

>Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
><http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.
>
>The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
>“theft”. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet passes
>on their accusations to the police, they don’t like it and accuse the ISP of
>“not doing enough”.



Not if you have not done is and have No recourse to defend your self..

Mary Hanna

Mary Hanna <> wrote:

> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:59:48 +1300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> <_zealand> wrote:
>
>>Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
>><http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.
>>
>>The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
>>“theft”. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet passes
>>on their accusations to the police, they donÂ’t like it and accuse the ISP of
>>“not doing enough”.
>
> Not if you have not done is and have No recourse to defend your self..

English is the primary language of this newsgroup, Mr Sheppard.
Be good enough to use it, if you can.

Nicolaas Hawkins

Gordon wrote:
> On 2009-11-07, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <_zealand> wrote:
>> Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
>> <http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.
>>
>> The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
>> ?theft?. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet passes
>> on their accusations to the police, they don?t like it and accuse the ISP of
>> ?not doing enough?.
>
> Who are they? The media, et al

The liars.

victor

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:52:05 +1300, Nicolaas Hawkins <>
wrote:

> Mary Hanna <> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:59:48 +1300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> <_zealand> wrote:
>>
>>>Update on the AFACT-versus-iiNet case
>>><http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/court-gets-torrent-full-about-linux>.
>>>
>>>The funny thing is, they insist on referring to copyright infringement as
>>>?theft?. But theft is a criminal, not a civil, offence. So when iiNet passes
>>>on their accusations to the police, they don?t like it and accuse the ISP of
>>>?not doing enough?.
>>
>> Not if you have not done is and have No recourse to defend your self..
>
>English is the primary language of this newsgroup, Mr Sheppard.
>Be good enough to use it, if you can.


F off you sick little Boy.

Mary Hanna