He sees you when you're sleeping - He knows when you're awake

He knows if you've been bad or good
So be good for goodness sake!

O! You better watch out!
You better not cry
Better not pout
I'm telling you why
It's WGA.

"the authentication system is said to provide daily information on the
user's IP address and other details that could be used to trace
information back to an individual home."

I've always bragged; I"ve never allowed WGA to be installed on my
system. Now I have good reason to. And while I have auto updates
disabled - They come if I allow them, when I do by accident, WGA is
there wanting to be installed ))

"The lawsuit is specific and would ask for at least $5 million in
compensation for the affected class of all Windows XP users in the
US."

Joining this class action law suit if you run XP, divided the by
others who also use XP. You might get a nickel.

But Microsoft knows what tickles your fancy.

I just ran across this article looking for something else.
http://www.electronista.com/articles...sued.over.wga/
Please note the fact that a Dan C approach is required to remove WGA.

1205 unread messages, I've been gone awhile.



--

A periodic table
http://i.imgur.com/5FVE8.jpg

Pennywise@DerryMaine.Gov

wrote in
news::

>
> He knows if you've been bad or good
> So be good for goodness sake!
>
> O! You better watch out!
> You better not cry
> Better not pout
> I'm telling you why
> It's WGA.
>
> "the authentication system is said to provide daily information on the
> user's IP address and other details that could be used to trace
> information back to an individual home."
>
> I've always bragged; I"ve never allowed WGA to be installed on my
> system. Now I have good reason to. And while I have auto updates
> disabled - They come if I allow them, when I do by accident, WGA is
> there wanting to be installed ))
>
> "The lawsuit is specific and would ask for at least $5 million in
> compensation for the affected class of all Windows XP users in the
> US."
>
> Joining this class action law suit if you run XP, divided the by
> others who also use XP. You might get a nickel.
>
> But Microsoft knows what tickles your fancy.
>
The real reason why the Microsoft firewall is only a half assed job.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

chuckcar

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:38:22 -0800, wrote:

> He knows if you've been bad or good
> So be good for goodness sake!
>
> O! You better watch out!
> You better not cry
> Better not pout
> I'm telling you why
> It's WGA.
>
> "the authentication system is said to provide daily information on the
> user's IP address and other details that could be used to trace
> information back to an individual home."
>
> I've always bragged; I"ve never allowed WGA to be installed on my
> system. Now I have good reason to. And while I have auto updates
> disabled - They come if I allow them, when I do by accident, WGA is
> there wanting to be installed ))
>
> "The lawsuit is specific and would ask for at least $5 million in
> compensation for the affected class of all Windows XP users in the
> US."
>
> Joining this class action law suit if you run XP, divided the by
> others who also use XP. You might get a nickel.
>
> But Microsoft knows what tickles your fancy.
>
> I just ran across this article looking for something else.
> http://www.electronista.com/articles...sued.over.wga/
> Please note the fact that a Dan C approach is required to remove WGA.
>
> 1205 unread messages, I've been gone awhile.

WGA>>we've gone apeshit

They can try to get all my personal information they want.
What they'll get is a bunch of lies.
now if they think they can find out where my home is simply through the IP,
well then they've been watching to much NCIS.
For one, I'm on verizon wireless. So me and laptop might be here one day,
elsewhere the next.

richard

§ñüh??£f <> wrote:

>> "the authentication system is said to provide daily information on the
>> user's IP address and other details that could be used to trace
>> information back to an individual home."
>>
>
>Plus the chipset that cant be disabled in the BIOS settings on kit made
>after 2003, IIRC.

2006 it started to be installed and it's not a chip set, just part of
it, Its called the TPM Chip.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module
I've mentioned this before, but this chip is in your computer if it's
fairly new, your able at this time to disable it, depending upon your
bios settings.

It will be in all computers and other devices and activated around
2015. You block it's output, you don't connect to the internet.

It started out as claiming to be a spam blocker. You send bulk spam,
the IP just blocked your TPM chip number and your not a problem
anymore.

Its a bad thing, its abuse apparent.

>> Joining this class action law suit if you run XP, divided the by
>> others who also use XP. You might get a nickel.

>Heh...its in Washington state.

You have to file where the courts have jurisdiction. Microsoft, while
everywhere, address is Redmond Wa.



>> I just ran across this article looking for something else.
>> http://www.electronista.com/articles...sued.over.wga/
>> Please note the fact that a Dan C approach is required to remove WGA.

>Not really. Its a registry hack. And either renaming or removing some
>files in \system32\dll cache...
>About as easy as pie

I took the articles word for that one. My sister lost her cooperate
password (company didn't pay up) and she was getting WGA errors,
couldn't do much of anything except connect to the internet with her
browser - which was just fine with her, as all she did was watch
movies all day (bed ridden at times).

I took Autoruns to her place and under "everything" at the very bottom
is WGAsomeotherletters.somethingelse, I just disabled that from
loading and she had her computer back.
--

A periodic table
http://i.imgur.com/5FVE8.jpg

Pennywise@DerryMaine.Gov

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:21:42 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:16:43 -0700, richard <> wrote:
>
>>They can try to get all my personal information they want.
>>What they'll get is a bunch of lies.
>
> Which is what you are - lies. Or misinformation. Or stupidity.
> Whatever you want to call it.
>
>>now if they think they can find out where my home is simply through the IP,
>>well then they've been watching to much NCIS.
>>For one, I'm on verizon wireless. So me and laptop might be here one day,
>>elsewhere the next.
>
> *sigh* here we go again, let the stupidity begin.

Well you're the smart boy around here.
Explain please then sir, how is it possible for one of YOUR customers to
service a multitude of users with only one input to the internet?

Assume a motel has 100 units, or any business actually. The motel is
connected to the internet via one, and only one, connection like perhaps
cable. Each unit is occupied and each unit has a working computer connected
to the internet. If you personally went to each room and checked the IP,
would you have 100 ip's or only 1?

You never have a given a solid answer of one or the other. Just more of
your bullshit.

richard

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:01:07 -0800, wrote:

> §ñüh??£f <> wrote:
>
>>> "the authentication system is said to provide daily information on the
>>> user's IP address and other details that could be used to trace
>>> information back to an individual home."
>>>
>>
>>Plus the chipset that cant be disabled in the BIOS settings on kit made
>>after 2003, IIRC.
>
> 2006 it started to be installed and it's not a chip set, just part of
> it, Its called the TPM Chip.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module
> I've mentioned this before, but this chip is in your computer if it's
> fairly new, your able at this time to disable it, depending upon your
> bios settings.
>
> It will be in all computers and other devices and activated around
> 2015. You block it's output, you don't connect to the internet.
>
> It started out as claiming to be a spam blocker. You send bulk spam,
> the IP just blocked your TPM chip number and your not a problem
> anymore.
>
> Its a bad thing, its abuse apparent.
>
>>> Joining this class action law suit if you run XP, divided the by
>>> others who also use XP. You might get a nickel.
>
>>Heh...its in Washington state.
>
> You have to file where the courts have jurisdiction. Microsoft, while
> everywhere, address is Redmond Wa.
>
>

The corp hq is in washington state. Redmond is where the servers are most
likely. If it is a federal law issue, legally, you can file in any federal
court. Then, if applicable, you will be advised which court will hear the
case.

richard

richard, ye porn-ogling addicted so and so, I will chastise thee, thy
high minded strumpet, ye pestered:

>> You have to file where the courts have jurisdiction. Microsoft, while
>> everywhere, address is Redmond Wa.

> The corp hq is in washington state. Redmond is where the servers are
> most likely.

Bullis, just what the **** do you think WA means, other than Washington, in
the phrase "Redmond WA", you completely useless good-for-nothing ****wit?

--
Contort the acute injector using a neorouter. The dynoreserve turgescing
sensor is suspect. You can also try to direct the auxiliary matter
stream and buckle the matrix-beam assignment. Check the manual for
instructions. Check the category of the matrix-pattern disk. Also
circumvent the omegadissipation fluttering cable if necessary.

Kadaitcha Man

Evan Platt wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:16:43 -0700, richard <> wrote:
>
>> They can try to get all my personal information they want.
>> What they'll get is a bunch of lies.
>
> Which is what you are - lies. Or misinformation. Or stupidity.
> Whatever you want to call it.
>
>> now if they think they can find out where my home is simply through the IP,
>> well then they've been watching to much NCIS.
>> For one, I'm on verizon wireless. So me and laptop might be here one day,
>> elsewhere the next.
>
> *sigh* here we go again, let the stupidity begin.

He obviously doesn't know about mac addys, logins, or other such
things. Do what I do. Laugh, and know one day his stupidity will bite
him on the ass.

n0i

thund3rstruck

richard wrote:
> Well you're the smart boy around here.
> Explain please then sir, how is it possible for one of YOUR customers to
> service a multitude of users with only one input to the internet?
>
> Assume a motel has 100 units, or any business actually. The motel is
> connected to the internet via one, and only one, connection like perhaps
> cable. Each unit is occupied and each unit has a working computer connected
> to the internet. If you personally went to each room and checked the IP,
> would you have 100 ip's or only 1?
>
> You never have a given a solid answer of one or the other. Just more of
> your bullshit.

I'm not Evan, but I will say that when you connect to most hotels, you
have to click an agreement. When you do, your mac addy is logged. A mac
addy is a unique address built into your network card. All anyone then
has to do to trace back to you is to go to the manufacturer, and follow
the trail...to your door.

n0i

thund3rstruck

Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, The Old Sourdough was heard
to say:

> richard mumbled in 24hoursupport.helpdesk:
> snip
>
>> Well you're the smart boy around here.
>> Explain please then sir, how is it possible for one of YOUR customers to
>> service a multitude of users with only one input to the internet?
>
> With a router.

Amazing isn't it, I thought that would be pretty obvious. Oh, I see you're
replying to RtS.

>> Assume a motel has 100 units, or any business actually. The motel is
>> connected to the internet via one, and only one, connection like perhaps
>> cable. Each unit is occupied and each unit has a working computer connected
>> to the internet. If you personally went to each room and checked the IP,
>> would you have 100 ip's or only 1?
>
> 100, each assigned by the motel router.
> Do a little reading on NAZT.

Don't rush him, he's got to figure out what a router is yet..

--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!

William Poaster