Brian Tamaki and Steve Ballmer

What is the difference between Brian Tamaki and Steve Ballmer?

peterwn

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:56:00 -0800, peterwn wrote:

> What is the difference between Brian Tamaki and Steve Ballmer?

One is already on record for throwing chairs?


--
"Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean"

Carnations

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Carnations
<> shouted from the highest rooftop:

>On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:56:00 -0800, peterwn wrote:
>
>> What is the difference between Brian Tamaki and Steve Ballmer?
>

Hair?

Donchano

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:58:22 +1300, Donchano wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:27:24 +0000 (UTC), Carnations
> <> shouted from the highest rooftop:
>
>>On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:56:00 -0800, peterwn wrote:
>>
>>> What is the difference between Brian Tamaki and Steve Ballmer?
>
> Hair?

One needs a bodygard, but hasn't.

The other has two bodygards but needn't (coz The Lawd be on his side hellaluyah bruddas).


--
"Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean"

Carnations

On Nov 3, 12:58*pm, vitw <nos...@somewhere.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:56:00 -0800, peterwn wrote:
> > What is the difference between Brian Tamaki and Steve Ballmer?
>
> One doesn't yet have dominant market share

He he he.

The answer i had in mind:

there is no real difference - both require utter and continuing
loyalty from the elders / congregation / staff / gold partners / other
partners / mobo suppliers / shills (including Impossible) , etc, etc.

peterwn

vitw wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:59:47 +1300, Allistar wrote:
>
>> Imagine the fuss if people were allowed to change and contribute to
>> "holy texts" as they please! It would make the Nicene Creed pale in
>> comparison.
>
> /me seriously contemplates setting up a Holy Wiki site
>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...and_harassment

Bugger mediating that, it's bad enough in nz.general

Sailor Sam

WorkHard wrote:
> Sailor Sam wrote:
>> vitw wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:59:47 +1300, Allistar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Imagine the fuss if people were allowed to change and
>>>> contribute to
>>>> "holy texts" as they please! It would make the Nicene Creed
>>>> pale in
>>>> comparison.
>>> /me seriously contemplates setting up a Holy Wiki site
>>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...and_harassment
>>
>> Bugger mediating that, it's bad enough in nz.general
>
> Stay out, then.
>
>

Enjoy watching you fail too much John.

Sailor Sam

WorkHard wrote:
> Sailor Sam wrote:
>> WorkHard wrote:
>>> Sailor Sam wrote:
>>>> vitw wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:59:47 +1300, Allistar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Imagine the fuss if people were allowed to change and
>>>>>> contribute to
>>>>>> "holy texts" as they please! It would make the Nicene Creed
>>>>>> pale in
>>>>>> comparison.
>>>>> /me seriously contemplates setting up a Holy Wiki site
>>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...and_harassment
>>>>
>>>> Bugger mediating that, it's bad enough in nz.general
>>> Stay out, then.
>>>
>>>
>> Enjoy watching you fail too much John.
>
> I note you have no friends in here either, so talking about
> failure... ROFL
>
>

^^^ vitw, and you want a wiki on something people like him will argue
the toss about day in day out

Sailor Sam

WorkHard wrote:
> Sailor Sam wrote:
>> WorkHard wrote:
>>> Sailor Sam wrote:
>>>> WorkHard wrote:
>>>>> Sailor Sam wrote:
>>>>>> vitw wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:59:47 +1300, Allistar wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Imagine the fuss if people were allowed to change and
>>>>>>>> contribute to
>>>>>>>> "holy texts" as they please! It would make the Nicene
>>>>>>>> Creed
>>>>>>>> pale in
>>>>>>>> comparison.
>>>>>>> /me seriously contemplates setting up a Holy Wiki site
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critici...and_harassment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bugger mediating that, it's bad enough in nz.general
>>>>> Stay out, then.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Enjoy watching you fail too much John.
>>> I note you have no friends in here either, so talking about
>>> failure... ROFL
>>>
>>>
>> ^^^ vitw, and you want a wiki on something people like him will
>> argue
>> the toss about day in day out
>
> No need. It's fun watching you squirm on nz.general
>
>

dot dot dot

Sailor Sam