![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Think Win7 is fast? Think again. In this test, each operating system has been freshly installed and features exactly the same hardware configuration. Auto-login is enabled, and each will launch Firefox which will then proceed to load the same web page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aal60AqBs peter |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:18:55 +1300, peter wrote:
> Think Win7 is fast? Think again. > In this test, each operating system has been freshly installed and > features exactly the same hardware configuration. Auto-login is enabled, > and each will launch Firefox which will then proceed to load the same > web page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aal60AqBs Interesting bootup/login/webpage load stats: Ubuntu 9.10: 40s Ubuntu 9.04: 51s MS Windows NT 6.0 "Vista": 67s MS Windows NT 6.1 "7": 72s -- "Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean" Carnations |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:01:05 +0000, Carnations wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:18:55 +1300, peter wrote: > >> Think Win7 is fast? Think again. >> In this test, each operating system has been freshly installed and >> features exactly the same hardware configuration. Auto-login is >> enabled, and each will launch Firefox which will then proceed to load >> the same web page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aal60AqBs > > Interesting bootup/login/webpage load stats: > > Ubuntu 9.10: 40s > Ubuntu 9.04: 51s > MS Windows NT 6.0 "Vista": 67s > MS Windows NT 6.1 "7": 72s So okay Ill bite ... to better inform the some what dim trolls .. http://lifehacker.com/5124955/window...0-second-boot- time I havent bothered timing my quad core with win7 but i doubt those figures are to wide of the mark.. My CPU graphs show the 4 cores maxed out as the desktop loads.. vista barely used 2 cores ... at the latter desktop loading stage. And its all very nice these parallel boot start ups until you get program A that fails to start due to some service it rely's on but that services hasnt been started yet. And before you both lie that this cant happen go google opensuse & vmware- server startup failures. Nextttttttttttttt Bigglezzzz BigglesZz |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Carnations" <> wrote in message
news > On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:18:55 +1300, peter wrote: > >> Think Win7 is fast? Think again. >> In this test, each operating system has been freshly installed and >> features exactly the same hardware configuration. Auto-login is enabled, >> and each will launch Firefox which will then proceed to load the same >> web page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aal60AqBs > > Interesting bootup/login/webpage load stats: > > Ubuntu 9.10: 40s > Ubuntu 9.04: 51s > MS Windows NT 6.0 "Vista": 67s > MS Windows NT 6.1 "7": 72s I wonder what the specs were on that machine. My HP mini 5101, which is a netbook and not exactly high specced, boots into 7 fully responsive in about 40 seconds. It was booting in ~30s when it was brand new with only the default services starting. Will have to time the probook when I get home and see what time that gets. Nik Coughlin |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:17:13 +1300, Nik Coughlin wrote:
> "Carnations" <> wrote in message > news >> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:18:55 +1300, peter wrote: >> >>> Think Win7 is fast? Think again. >>> In this test, each operating system has been freshly installed and >>> features exactly the same hardware configuration. Auto-login is >>> enabled, and each will launch Firefox which will then proceed to load >>> the same web page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aal60AqBs >> >> Interesting bootup/login/webpage load stats: >> >> Ubuntu 9.10: 40s >> Ubuntu 9.04: 51s >> MS Windows NT 6.0 "Vista": 67s >> MS Windows NT 6.1 "7": 72s > > I wonder what the specs were on that machine. My HP mini 5101, which is > a netbook and not exactly high specced, boots into 7 fully responsive in > about 40 seconds. It was booting in ~30s when it was brand new with > only the default services starting. Will have to time the probook when > I get home and see what time that gets. This wasn't merely bootup - it was boot, automatically login, automagically load Firefox, and have it load a default webpage into Firefox. All were on the same spec'd hardware and presumably with outofthebox settings. -- "Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean" Carnations |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:46:14 +0000, BigglesZz wrote:
> So okay Ill bite ... to better inform the some what dim trolls .. > > http://lifehacker.com/5124955/window...0-second-boot- > time Sub-30s boot times may be all well and good, but you need to add onto that the length of time required to login and to load the browser and to have the browser load the web page. -- "Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean" Carnations |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"peter" <> wrote in message news:hcjcot$d79$... > > Think Win7 is fast? Think again. > In this test, each operating system has been freshly installed and > features > exactly the same hardware configuration. Auto-login is enabled, and each > will launch Firefox which will then proceed to load the same web page. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88aal60AqBs > > LOL. It's been ages since boot time mattered to anyone except nixophiliacs. Ever heard of Sleep mode? The last time I cold-booted my Vista desktop was 2 months ago when I went on vacation. If only I'd been using Ubuntu, I could have saved myself......what was it?.....16 seconds? Oh, wait....no....that's 16 seconds minus the 90 seconds needed to satisfy the nixopliliac mania by **watching** 4 machines boot up on youtube. Do you guys ever do any work? impossible |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:38:18 +0000, impossible wrote:
> LOL. It's been ages since boot time mattered to anyone except > nixophiliacs. Ever heard of Sleep mode? The last time I cold-booted my > Vista desktop was 2 months ago when I went on vacation. That's because Vista takes so very long to boot up and to log in! -- "Filtering the Internet is like trying to boil the ocean" Carnations |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:19:48 +0000, Carnations wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:38:18 +0000, impossible wrote: > >> LOL. It's been ages since boot time mattered to anyone except >> nixophiliacs. Ever heard of Sleep mode? The last time I cold-booted my >> Vista desktop was 2 months ago when I went on vacation. > Hrmmm my office outlook program screwed up badly yesterday & outlook wouldnt start-up ... and I was blaming the fact i had started using sleep mode with win7 .. bugger > That's because Vista takes so very long to boot up and to log in! Why do you think they used ubuntu versus win7 .. Ill explain it slowly for you cuppapee.. Ubuntu has light weight DE ... Try this boot race with opensuse kde4xxx then at least your comparing comparable software.and if you had actually ever used vista-service- pack-1/2 or win7 you would know that opening IE / & a web page doesnt take that long. BigglesZZZzzzzzzzzz BigglesZz |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Loads of GREAT SOFTWARE ( 20,000 plus programs DVDS and CDs), updated 2007/11/06 | ola@mail.gr | Computer Support | 0 | 11-07-2007 08:58 PM |
| this literature just for the great player who paly at the battlefront | vincent | Computer Support | 0 | 09-10-2007 08:06 AM |
| Great Free Software Blog, (Help Center) | todizzytotell@gmail.com | Computer Support | 5 | 04-11-2007 10:11 PM |
| GREAT SITE IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE WITH SPYWARE | writetoamh@yahoo.com | Computer Support | 0 | 03-14-2005 06:41 PM |
| Re: I found this great little site. | me | Computer Security | 2 | 11-21-2004 05:00 PM |