Re: Don't forget to send your favorites!

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:49:45 -0500, "J. Clarke" <>
wrote:

>tony cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".
>>
>>> I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
>>> probably not the, "Word of God".
>>
>> Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
>> those two sentences.
>
>Both of them could benefit from "attitude adjustments".

As the ol' saying goes, "They don't have an attitude problem, you have a
being nothing but assholes problem."

Helping the OT Trolls

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:38:42 -0800, "Bill Graham" <>
wrote:

>
>"tony cooper" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".
>>
>>>I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
>>>probably not the, "Word of God".
>>
>> Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
>> those two sentences.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
>
>Only Tony can't tell the difference between, "Start an argument with", and
>"Bring to the attention of".

Sure I do. "Start an argument with" is a straight-forward and honest
statement of intent. "Bring to the attention of" is a disingenuous
opening that allows the person to feign surprise at ending up in an
argument.



--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

tony cooper