Re: Jupiter

On 25 Oct 2009 05:09:26 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>Ignorant Trolls <> wrote:
>>On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:49:03 +1300, Eric Stevens <>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Hardly ever any wind. Hardly ever any rain (those clouds are
>>>exceptional). Hardly anyone or anything for many many miles in any
>>>direction. Lovely flat terrain over which the air flow stabilises.
>>>Oodnadata is not an entirely silly suggestion, except for the thought
>>>of living there.
>>
>>Sounds almost perfect, doesn't it? To an ignorant troll perhaps.
>
>And here you are! The ignorant troll!
>
>>But like all useless trolls
>
>You just keep coming back.

All anyone need do is remind their self how your comments are in reference
to your own self. Like in the thread about no manual flash settings being
on P&S cameras, where direct evidence was given to prove you 100% wrong. In
that too you continually told your troll-self to go away after you were
proved 100% wrong.

And here you are, doing it again.

Outing Ignorant Trolls Is FUN!

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:39:02 +1000, Doug Jewell
<> wrote:

>Look! Another Troll! wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:56:56 +1000, Noons <> wrote:
>>
>>> Outing Trolls wrote,on my timestamp of 24/10/2009 9:24 PM:
>>>> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:17:05 +1000, Noons <> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Goos stuff as usual, Piggo. Pity you can't move all that gear 300 miles inland,
>>>>> eh?
>>>> Inland is worse, but then you'd know this if you knew the least bit about
>>>> photography and astronomy. Another **** poor attempt of yours to try to
>>>> look like you knew something. Trolls never do.
>>>>
>>> What an idiot...
>>
>> Inland *is* worse, because inland air is more unstable, has higher
>> fluctuations in humidity levels, often contains more dust and particulate
>> pollutants, and is downright turbulent compared to areas near ocean air.
>> All are enemies of "seeing" conditions. The weakest link when you have a
>> decent telescope optics.
>You haven't got a bloody clue do you? The best observatories
>are placed where a) light pollution is minimal, b) humidity
>is low, and c) altitude is high. There are a few places
>where some of these conditions can be achieved relatively
>close to a coastline, but for the most part these conditions
>are more likely to exist inland.

No, only the most convenient of them are inland, for cultures that can't be
bothered with or can't afford to think globally. Inland because most of the
population has already overbred and colonized most shores, creating the
light pollution that excludes those prime locations for astronomy. That's
why the most prized locations are in such short supply. High altitude, if
possible, near large masses of ocean water, with low-population density.
Mauna Kea qualifies perfectly.

<The rest of your limited australian values and shallow reasoning, snipped.
I'm starting to think this is genetic from all those low-life criminal
morons inbreeding for so long. Your culture is providing so many
present-day examples of this.>

Look! Another Troll!

Look! Another Troll! <> wrote:
[...]

No, it is not another troll. It is the same old boring well-known
tedious P&S troll with the agravated split-personality disorder.

jue

Jürgen Exner

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:23:05 +1100, Noons <>
wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote,on my timestamp of 25/10/2009 4:50 PM:
>
>
>> You were the one who mentioned Oodnadata.
>
>Exactly.
>
>>
>> I thought I was coming to your aid.
>
>Really? By claiming "ignorance is mutual"? When it is obvious it is the florida
>troll that has no clue what/where he's talking about?

It was only obvious to those who already knew Oodnadata. I'm willing
to bet that the troll didn't have the faintest idea of what you were
talking about. That's why I said 'ignorance is mutual' (whatever he
said about you applied at least equally well to him) and went on to
post the photograph of the landscape. I could have posted photographs
of the town itself but that would have given the troll to talk about
the disturbance created by all those people..
>
>
>> Who needs enemies with friends like you?
>
>Precisely.

At least now I know what I'm dealing with.



Eric Stevens

Eric Stevens

Outing Ignorant Trolls Is FUN! <> wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:44:43 +1100, Noons <> wrote:
>
>>Outing Ignorant Trolls Is FUN! wrote,on my timestamp of 25/10/2009 1:05 PM:
>>
>>
>>> But like all useless trolls that know nothing about astronomy nor
>>> photography, trolls who also know nothing about meteorology nor how land
>>> cools off and heats up quicker with larger thermal contrasts (compared to
>>> large bodies of water), they can't comprehend how this huge contrast in
>>> thermal energies are fed into the atmosphere directly above the land .This
>>
>><rest of demented raving clipped>
>>
>>And of course you are an expert in photography, meteorology and astronomy.
>>One wanders why you're posting as an unidentified troll from a well known troll
>>site, instead of working in Chile.
>>Ah yes: there are no "observatories" in florida...
>>
>>BWAHAHAHA!
>>
>bwahahah right back atcha ... you know nothing of geology as well, I see.

And you asshole trolls simply know nothing.

--
Ray Fischer

Ray Fischer

Ignorant Trolls <> wrote:
>On 25 Oct 2009 05:09:26 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>Ignorant Trolls <> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:49:03 +1300, Eric Stevens <>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hardly ever any wind. Hardly ever any rain (those clouds are
>>>>exceptional). Hardly anyone or anything for many many miles in any
>>>>direction. Lovely flat terrain over which the air flow stabilises.
>>>>Oodnadata is not an entirely silly suggestion, except for the thought
>>>>of living there.
>>>
>>>Sounds almost perfect, doesn't it? To an ignorant troll perhaps.
>>
>>And here you are! The ignorant troll!
>>
>>>But like all useless trolls
>>
>>You just keep coming back.
>
>All anyone need do is

Tell you asshole trolls to go away.

--
Ray Fischer

Ray Fischer

On Oct 26, 1:28*am, Outing Ignorant Trolls Is FUN! <oi...@oitif.org>
wrote:


>
> bwahahah right back atcha ... you know nothing of geology as well, I see.

STFU, idiot. You are an embarassment to mankind.

Noons

On Oct 26, 7:48*am, Eric Stevens <eric.stev...@sum.co.nz> wrote:

> >> I thought I was coming to your aid.
>
> >Really? *By claiming "ignorance is mutual"? When it is obvious it is the florida
> >troll that has no clue what/where he's talking about?
>
> It was only obvious to those who already knew Oodnadata. I'm willing
> to bet that the troll didn't have the faintest idea of what you were
> talking about.

So, that's why you claimed mutual ignorance? Funny kind of "mutual"
you have: one side doesn't have a clue, so both sides are ignorant.
Right...


> That's why I said 'ignorance is mutual' (whatever he
> said about you applied at least equally well to him)

Oh please!


> post the photograph of the landscape. I could have posted photographs
> of the town itself but that would have given the troll to talk about
> the disturbance created by all those people..

LOL! At last: some good humour!

Noons

On Oct 26, 1:48*am, Look! Another Troll! <l...@lookingfortrolls.org>
wrote:

> No, only the most convenient of them are inland, for cultures that can't be
> bothered with or can't afford to think globally. Inland because most of the
> population has already overbred and colonized most shores, creating the

You fogot global warming...

> <The rest of your limited australian values and shallow reasoning, snipped.
> I'm starting to think this is genetic from all those low-life criminal
> morons inbreeding for so long. Your culture is providing so many
> present-day examples of this.>

I'm starting to think you are not only a troll but also in need of a
good serving of good manners...

Noons

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:19:56 -0700 (PDT), Noons <>
wrote:

>On Oct 26, 7:48*am, Eric Stevens <eric.stev...@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> >> I thought I was coming to your aid.
>>
>> >Really? *By claiming "ignorance is mutual"? When it is obvious it is the florida
>> >troll that has no clue what/where he's talking about?
>>
>> It was only obvious to those who already knew Oodnadata. I'm willing
>> to bet that the troll didn't have the faintest idea of what you were
>> talking about.
>
>So, that's why you claimed mutual ignorance? Funny kind of "mutual"
>you have: one side doesn't have a clue, so both sides are ignorant.
>Right...
>
>
>> That's why I said 'ignorance is mutual' (whatever he
>> said about you applied at least equally well to him)
>
>Oh please!
>
>
>> post the photograph of the landscape. I could have posted photographs
>> of the town itself but that would have given the troll to talk about
>> the disturbance created by all those people..
>
>LOL! At last: some good humour!

I think you owe me an apology. If not that, you should at least cool
down.

Just to make the troll's day, here are two photographs of Oodnadata

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2569/...6f7e7b02_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2427/...f519fca5_b.jpg

As you can see, it is at the crest of a local mountain.



Eric Stevens

Eric Stevens