Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Computer Support > Windows Updates

Reply
Thread Tools

Windows Updates

 
 
OldGringo38
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-14-2009
All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>
--
Old Gringo
Just West Of Nowhere
Enjoy Life And Live It To Its Fullest
http://www.NuBoy-Industries.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
chuckcar
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-14-2009
OldGringo38 <> wrote in
news:hb4ogb$m56$:

> All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
> upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>


It's still almost the "every second one" rule: dos 4, dos 6, Millenium,
Vista. If it was an automaker they'd be called citroen or lada.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Buffalo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-14-2009


OldGringo38 wrote:
> All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
> upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>


On my Win2000Pro machine, two of the .Net Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1
updates keep wanting to install even though they are already installed.
KB953300 and KB971110.
Anyone else having this issue?
Buffalo


 
Reply With Quote
 
G. Morgan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-14-2009
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:50:54 -0500, OldGringo38 <>
wrote:

>All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
>upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>


I still can't get my Bluetooth adaptor to work right on Win7 x64. I wish
those drivers would appear on the updates.

 
Reply With Quote
 
lugnut
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-15-2009
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:13:46 -0600, "Buffalo"
<> wrote:

>
>
>OldGringo38 wrote:
>> All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
>> upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>

>
>On my Win2000Pro machine, two of the .Net Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1
>updates keep wanting to install even though they are already installed.
>KB953300 and KB971110.
>Anyone else having this issue?
>Buffalo
>



I had that problem a few weeks back. I ended up using the
MSI cleanup tool from MS along with their reset.cmd tool to
reset the machine permission to their default state. Ran
the update again with no problem. Reset permissions as
required. Today's update went smoothly.

Lugnut
 
Reply With Quote
 
Pennywise@DerryMaine.Gov
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-15-2009
"Buffalo" <> wrote:

>
>
>OldGringo38 wrote:
>> All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
>> upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>


>On my Win2000Pro machine, two of the .Net Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1
>updates keep wanting to install even though they are already installed.
>KB953300 and KB971110.
>Anyone else having this issue?


I have the autoupdates service disabled, just now my firewall asked if
C:\Temp\ProgramUpdaterMain.exe could run
1) nothing gets installed by me running from the temp dir.

I check the file out and it's a windows update - the fact it got past
my firewall Comodo is of concern.

While it could be for a few things this was kinda stood out.

Windows Installer
0000A2C8: 4837483174987348g.
0000A30E: \sseun.
0000A328: MAINPROG:
0000A340: REQUIRESELEVATEDADMIN:
0000A378: MISCELLANEOUS>
0000A39E: \sseintupdret.
0000A3CE: <ARGUMENTS>
0000A3EA: <NAME>
0000A3FC: REQUIRED
0000A414: PREREQ
0000A42C: (Required for
0000A454: DOTNET
0000A46A: .NET Framework
0000A49C: (Prerequisite for .NET Framework)
0000A4E6: \SSEIUBSreturn.
0000A51C: OpenProgram
0000A56A: MSIExecute

--

How soon people forget
http://imgur.com/CVkCC.png
 
Reply With Quote
 
Pennywise@DerryMaine.Gov
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-15-2009
wrote:

> "Buffalo" <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>OldGringo38 wrote:
>>> All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
>>> upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>

>
>>On my Win2000Pro machine, two of the .Net Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1
>>updates keep wanting to install even though they are already installed.
>>KB953300 and KB971110.
>>Anyone else having this issue?

>
>I have the autoupdates service disabled, just now my firewall asked if
>C:\Temp\ProgramUpdaterMain.exe could run
>1) nothing gets installed by me running from the temp dir.
>
>I check the file out and it's a windows update - the fact it got past
>my firewall Comodo is of concern.
>
>While it could be for a few things this was kinda stood out.


>0000A42C: (Required for
>0000A454: DOTNET
>0000A46A: .NET Framework
>0000A49C: (Prerequisite for .NET Framework)
>0000A4E6: \SSEIUBSreturn.
>0000A51C: OpenProgram
>0000A56A: MSIExecute


I found I had three .exe files or updates, understand I've never had
the autoupdates service running on any version of windows. The
majority of them are to fix holes in I.E. and I don't use that
program, this is the first time any updates have made it my way, So
I'm not used to reading them.

I dropped ZoneAlarm to give Comodo a try and it allowed the files to
show up, as MS is treated as a trusted site and allowed two way
access. *this with autoupdates disabled*.

One file is the autoupdater itself (ProgramUpdaterMain.exe), both
mention Chris.Long, this is his program http://www.ssesetup.com/ and
the update (SSEInternetUpdaterX.exe), SSE Setup Internet Update Module
(Main Process) It requires:
..NET framework download ability if user doesn't have

That's what the code in the last post ment - if you don't have .Net,
it's going to get/install it for you.

I just can't find the entry in the registry - to turn it off if you
already .net and it keeps trying to install it.

The other: Roboex32.exe
0000195E: FileDescription
00001980: RoboHELP Extensions for WinHelp
00001C58: WinHelp 2000: the next generation of WinHelp.

Is just a help file program.

Posted this as I insinuated in the last post that the update installed
..Net, which is correct with the right conditions (you don't have it)
but it's not what it's suppose to do.

--

This guy paints himself... no trick photography ... no photoshop ...he just paints himself... (v1kram.posterous.com)

http://v1kram.posterous.com/liu-boli...nvisible-man/?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Buffalo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-08-2009


Buffalo wrote:
> OldGringo38 wrote:
>> All seems to have went well, both on XP & 7. Maybe with all the
>> upcoming competition, Billy Bob is starting to do a better job. ? <g>

>
> On my Win2000Pro machine, two of the .Net Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1
> updates keep wanting to install even though they are already
> installed. KB953300 and KB971110.
> Anyone else having this issue?
> Buffalo

Well, I got it fixed.
I used the MS Net Framework uninstaller 'cleanup_tool.exe' (which I got from
MS support) and uninstalled all NET versions, rebooted and then used MS
updates to install whatever it said I should. Now it is fine.
Anyhow, the secret was in using the above mentioned uninstall tool,
rebooting and then using MS Updates.
Buffalo


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
checking "Show Updates" doesn't reveal any Windows XP updates =?Utf-8?B?d2xzNTA4?= Windows 64bit 5 05-26-2006 04:42 PM
Windows/Office recommended updates =?Utf-8?B?Qy5SaW5hbGRp?= Microsoft Certification 0 09-29-2005 05:48 PM
Cisco 350 card, XP and Windows Updates =?Utf-8?B?a2Vob2xtZXM=?= Wireless Networking 0 05-05-2005 09:40 PM
windows Critical updates xp 2 =?Utf-8?B?UGVhZGFy?= Microsoft Certification 0 02-22-2005 11:03 PM
Did today's Windows updates break wireless?? The Celtic Warrior Wireless Networking 2 07-15-2004 10:41 PM



Advertisments