On 2009-09-25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <_zealand> wrote:
> In message <>, Carnations wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:15:36 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>>>> But then again, once a protocol is implemented in a piece of Free
>>>>> Software, which is freely usable, copyable, modifiable and
>>>>> distributable, can you still accuse that protocol of being
>>>>> "proprietary"?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, if you have to license the use of it!!
>>>
>>> Which part of "freely usable, copyable, modifiable and distributable"
>>> did you miss?
>>
>> What part of "proprietary" did you mess?
>
> Where?
Mess, is about food.
|