«

This is absolutely brilliant...
http://www.democraticunderground.com...ll&address=389
x6181595

Send in the clowns

--
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people
by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and
sudden usurpations.... The means of defense against foreign danger historically
have become the instruments of tyranny at home."
-James Madison

§ñühw¤£f <> wrote in
news:h4t23f$u1d$:

> This is absolutely brilliant...
> http://www.democraticunderground.com...=view_all&addr
> ess=389 x6181595
>
> Send in the clowns
>
I was under the impression that the KKK was banned in the US. If they can
jail US citizens in foreign lands without trial, how is it that the KKK
can still exist?


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Rôgêr <> wrote in
news: om:

> chuckcar wrote:
>> §ñühw¤£f <> wrote in
>> news:h4t23f$u1d$:
>>
>>> This is absolutely brilliant...
>>> http://www.democraticunderground.com...az=view_all&ad
>>> dr ess=389 x6181595
>>>
>>> Send in the clowns
>>>
>> I was under the impression that the KKK was banned in the US. If they
>> can jail US citizens in foreign lands without trial, how is it that the
>> KKK can still exist?
>
> Not banned, they have 1st Amendment rights. Unfortunately.
>
Um. No, that is overidden by their abuse thereof. All constitutional
rights are only applicable if they're not used to break existing laws.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Bada bing chuckcar <> bada bang:
> Rôgêr <> wrote in
> news: om:
>
>> chuckcar wrote:
>>> §ñühw¤£f <> wrote in
>>> news:h4t23f$u1d$:
>>>
>>>> This is absolutely brilliant...
>>>> http://www.democraticunderground.com...az=view_all&ad
>>>> dr ess=389 x6181595
>>>>
>>>> Send in the clowns
>>>>
>>> I was under the impression that the KKK was banned in the US. If they
>>> can jail US citizens in foreign lands without trial, how is it that the
>>> KKK can still exist?
>>
>> Not banned, they have 1st Amendment rights. Unfortunately.
>>
> Um. No, that is overidden by their abuse thereof. All constitutional
> rights are only applicable if they're not used to break existing laws.
>
>

That is a rather broad and incorrect interpretation of, "The
First Amendment does not allow the shouting of 'Fire' in a
crowded theatre."

Mike "but we expect that of you" Yetto
--
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitas.
- William of Ockham

Bada bing Rôgêr <> bada bang:
> §ñühw¤£f wrote:
>> This is absolutely brilliant...
>> http://www.democraticunderground.com...ll&address=389
>> x6181595
>>
>> Send in the clowns
>
> Knoxville isn't that far from me, about 100 miles. I'm real proud of
> them Vols for doing that.

Please tell me this really happened and it isn't some joke news
story that should have happened.

Mike "puhleeeeze" Yetto
--
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitas.
- William of Ockham

Mike Yetto <> pinched out a steaming pile
of<>:

>Bada bing Rôgêr <> bada bang:
>> §ñühw¤£f wrote:
>>> This is absolutely brilliant...
>>>
http://www.democraticunderground.com...az=view_all&ad
dress=389
>>> x6181595
>>>
>>> Send in the clowns
>>
>> Knoxville isn't that far from me, about 100 miles. I'm real proud of
>> them Vols for doing that.
>
>Please tell me this really happened and it isn't some joke news
>story that should have happened.
>
>Mike "puhleeeeze" Yetto

Its the real deal.
Its brilliant...strange it hasnt been done before.
(maybe it has?)

^_^

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

Rôgêr <> pinched out a steaming pile
of< >:

>chuckcar wrote:
>> §ñühw¤£f <> wrote in
>> news:h4t23f$u1d$:
>>
>>> This is absolutely brilliant...
>>>
http://www.democraticunderground.com...az=view_all&ad
dr
>>> ess=389 x6181595
>>>
>>> Send in the clowns
>>>
>> I was under the impression that the KKK was banned in the US. If
they can
>> jail US citizens in foreign lands without trial, how is it that the
KKK
>> can still exist?
>
>Not banned, they have 1st Amendment rights. Unfortunately.

As a member of teh ACLU I ferverently support the rights of Stupid
People to parade their stupidity proudly.

^_^

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

Mike Yetto <> wrote in
news::

> Bada bing chuckcar <> bada bang:
>> Rôgêr <> wrote in
>> news: om:
>>
>>> chuckcar wrote:
>>>> §ñühw¤£f <> wrote in
>>>> news:h4t23f$u1d$:
>>>>
>>>>> This is absolutely brilliant...
>>>>> http://www.democraticunderground.com...p?az=view_all&
>>>>> ad dr ess=389 x6181595
>>>>>
>>>>> Send in the clowns
>>>>>
>>>> I was under the impression that the KKK was banned in the US. If they
>>>> can jail US citizens in foreign lands without trial, how is it that
>>>> the KKK can still exist?
>>>
>>> Not banned, they have 1st Amendment rights. Unfortunately.
>>>
>> Um. No, that is overidden by their abuse thereof. All constitutional
>> rights are only applicable if they're not used to break existing laws.
>>
> That is a rather broad and incorrect interpretation of, "The
> First Amendment does not allow the shouting of 'Fire' in a
> crowded theatre."

No, you miss my point. The KKK uses their 1st amendment to stop *other*
people having rights. That makes them unable to claim their own rights are
violated.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Bada bing chuckcar <> bada bang:
> Mike Yetto <> wrote in
> news::
>
>> Bada bing chuckcar <> bada bang:
>>> Um. No, that is overidden by their abuse thereof. All constitutional
>>> rights are only applicable if they're not used to break existing laws.
>>>
>> That is a rather broad and incorrect interpretation of, "The
>> First Amendment does not allow the shouting of 'Fire' in a
>> crowded theatre."
>
> No, you miss my point. The KKK uses their 1st amendment to stop *other*
> people having rights. That makes them unable to claim their own rights are
> violated.
>

No, your point (and that expressed by many others) is that bad
guys can have their rights curtailed for the good of the many.
As long as you get to define bad guys and the many.

Mike "it tolls for thee" Yetto
--
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitas.
- William of Ockham

On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 03:05:53 -0400, Rôgêr <> wrote:

>chuckcar wrote:

<snip>

>> No, you miss my point. The KKK uses their 1st amendment to stop *other*
>> people having rights. That makes them unable to claim their own rights are
>> violated.
>
>Not sure what world you are living in, but the KKK in America has as
>much right to peaceable assembly and yell "white power" as do clowns. If
>they didn't, the term Free Speech would soon fade from our lexicon. It's
>the very essence of the 1st Amendment that ALL speech is allowed, even
>unsavory speech, unless it's along the lines of yelling fire in a
>theater as someone pointed out. You can't incite riots, you can't
>instigate a stampede in a dark theater. But if you want to express your
>opinion on something, no matter how stupid that opinion may be, it's
>allowed.

In theory, anyway.

--
"If there is one thing upon this earth that mankind love and admire
better than another, it is a brave man, - it is the man who dares to look
the devil in the face and tell him he is a devil." - James A. Garfield