Re: Memories of BoaterDave from 2006

Peter Foldes wrote:
> Just shows you Dave that I can go back to your posts even to 2006 to
> show how you are fibbing today in your posts. Unfortunately your
> memories are non existent and it is part of your downfall . Not the
> whole part but a part of it


For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
'relationship' with Peter Foldes, please pop in to the newsgroup
'microsoft.public.test.here' or to www.pqlr.org/bbs where a better
picture may be gleaned.

Mr Foldes has today reproduced, accurately, copies of my posts I made
three years ago (may be seen in the MS test group)

I am well aware that Google knows everything but why - do YOU think -
would a run-of-the-mill newsgroup poster have copies of messages which I
made years ago. I *must* be *really* special, eh?!!

On the other hand, he may have copies of all of *your* personal posts
too. Is that likely, do you think? Would you care?

**

So ..... in reply to Peter:

My memory is fine, Peter, and I've been truthful always. I was most
interested, indeed delighted, to discover that you have accurate copies
of posts I made back in 2006. It does not surprise me at all.

Now - please tell me, and others reading here, exactly *WHY* you have
such records.

I'm quite certain that the Police, Security Services, FBI and any other
Government Agencies would be hung, drawn and quartered for abusing my
'Human Rights' if they were to hold such information.

Your explanation is eagerly awaited!

--
Dave

~BD~

On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,

No one cares.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

♥Ari♥

?Ari? wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
>> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,
>
> No one cares.

If no-one cares, Ari, why are our 'leaders' allowing our troops being
slaughtered in Afghanistan?

Should we all pull out, do you think, and leave the Taliban to do their
worst?

--
Dave

~BD~

In article <h4i3js$lf4$>,
says...
>
> ?Ari? wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
> >
> >> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
> >> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,
> >
> > No one cares.
>
> If no-one cares, Ari, why are our 'leaders' allowing our troops being
> slaughtered in Afghanistan?
>
> Should we all pull out, do you think, and leave the Taliban to do their
> worst?

BD, you're showing that you're a troll - this has nothing to do with
alt.computer.security.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Leythos

Leythos wrote:
> In article <h4i3js$lf4$>,
> says...
>>
>> ?Ari? wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
>>>> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,
>>>
>>> No one cares.
>>
>> If no-one cares, Ari, why are our 'leaders' allowing our troops being
>> slaughtered in Afghanistan?
>>
>> Should we all pull out, do you think, and leave the Taliban to do
>> their worst?
>
> BD, you're showing that you're a troll - this has nothing to do with
> alt.computer.security.


That is a matter of opinion! The taliban have to be funded - how do
*you* think it's achieved?

Reasons
There are many similarities (yet many fundamental differences) between
computer and physical security. Just like real-world security, the
motivations for breaches of computer security vary between attackers,
sometimes called hackers or crackers. Some are teenage thrill-seekers or
vandals (the kind often responsible for defacing web sites); similarly,
some web site defacements are done to make political statements.
However, some attackers are highly skilled and motivated with the goal
of compromising computers for financial gain or espionage. An example of
the latter is Markus Hess (more diligent than skilled), who spied for
the KGB and was ultimately caught because of the efforts of Clifford
Stoll, who wrote an amusing and accurate book, The Cuckoo's Egg, about
his experiences. For those seeking to prevent security breaches, the
first step is usually to attempt to identify what might motivate an
attack on the system, how much the continued operation and information
security of the system are worth, and who might be motivated to breach
it. The precautions required for a home PC are very different for those
of banks' Internet banking system, and different again for a classified
military network. Other computer security writers suggest that, since an
attacker using a network need know nothing about you or what you have on
your computer, attacker motivation is inherently impossible to determine
beyond guessing. If true, blocking all possible attacks is the only
plausible action to take.

An extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_insecurity

~BD~

From: "~BD~" <>

| Leythos wrote:
>> In article <h4i3js$lf4$>,
>> says...

>>> ?Ari? wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

>>>>> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
>>>>> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,

>>>> No one cares.

>>> If no-one cares, Ari, why are our 'leaders' allowing our troops being
>>> slaughtered in Afghanistan?

>>> Should we all pull out, do you think, and leave the Taliban to do
>>> their worst?

>> BD, you're showing that you're a troll - this has nothing to do with
>> alt.computer.security.


| That is a matter of opinion! The taliban have to be funded - how do
| *you* think it's achieved?

Bullsh!t !

You've posted nothing in te realm of COMSEC or INFOSEC and only x-posted your flame war
BS.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

David H. Lipman

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~" <>
>
>> Leythos wrote:
>>> In article <h4i3js$lf4$>,
>>> says...
>
>>>> ?Ari? wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>>>>> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
>>>>>> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,
>
>>>>> No one cares.
>
>>>> If no-one cares, Ari, why are our 'leaders' allowing our troops
>>>> being slaughtered in Afghanistan?
>
>>>> Should we all pull out, do you think, and leave the Taliban to do
>>>> their worst?
>
>>> BD, you're showing that you're a troll - this has nothing to do with
>>> alt.computer.security.
>
>
>> That is a matter of opinion! The taliban have to be funded - how do
>> *you* think it's achieved?
>
> Bullsh!t !
>
> You've posted nothing in the realm of COMSEC or INFOSEC and only
> x-posted your flame war BS.


You *never* answer the questions!

[BD tosses in coins] OK. See you!

Time to declare your hand, David H. Lipman.

Who are you and for whom do you work - them ........ or us?

--
Dave (BD)

~BD~

In article <h4kbog$tat$>,
says...
>
> David H. Lipman wrote:
> > From: "~BD~" <>
> >
> >> Leythos wrote:
> >>> In article <h4i3js$lf4$>,
> >>> says...
> >
> >>>> ?Ari? wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:48:36 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
> >
> >>>>>> For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my
> >>>>>> 'relationship' with Peter Foldes,
> >
> >>>>> No one cares.
> >
> >>>> If no-one cares, Ari, why are our 'leaders' allowing our troops
> >>>> being slaughtered in Afghanistan?
> >
> >>>> Should we all pull out, do you think, and leave the Taliban to do
> >>>> their worst?
> >
> >>> BD, you're showing that you're a troll - this has nothing to do with
> >>> alt.computer.security.
> >
> >
> >> That is a matter of opinion! The taliban have to be funded - how do
> >> *you* think it's achieved?
> >
> > Bullsh!t !
> >
> > You've posted nothing in the realm of COMSEC or INFOSEC and only
> > x-posted your flame war BS.
>
>
> You *never* answer the questions!
>
> [BD tosses in coins] OK. See you!
>
> Time to declare your hand, David H. Lipman.
>
> Who are you and for whom do you work - them ........ or us?

BD, you don't appear to be a reasonable person, you appear to be a
troll, not a good one, but a troll.

Your questions are insulting.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Leythos

Leythos

I do trust my best friends, my five senses and the little voice inside
me that most civilians don't even hear - I listen to that.

I don't trust anything on the Internet - indeed, it was *you* who once
advised me not to do so, remember?

I trust myself.

--
Dave

~BD~

~BD~ wrote:

>
> Who are you and for whom do you work - them ........ or us?
>
> --
> Dave

The following, although seemingly entered in what you believe to be
something you term Usenet, is only visible by “Boater Dave” and his
many aliases.

*This is everything that you’ll be permitted to know about Mr. David
H. Lipman.*

Mr. David H. Lipman is a classified pseudonym given to a rather large
group of life forms. The entire present, known, living antimalware
section is known as “Dave” and is part of the overall secret
organization, possibly called “Them” or “They”. The present section’s
roster was recruited by several un-named intergalactic powers to fight
the never ending battle against malware and their ne’er do well authors.

The section is seemingly located on a seaboard of a large earth
continent, but in fact merely cloaks one of its many ultra secret
portals to a vast hardened inter-dimensional underground bunker where
the “Dave” toils in the never ending battle against malware, while
maintaining some loose associations with JIC, GCHQ, NSA, Lekem, and
Good Guys without borders.

Although now known to many as the highly valued & secretive “Malware
Community”, Dave agents have been recruited from many planets. Once
trained, and surgically modified, the highly coveted and experienced
Dave section members are highly compensated. Alas, once injected with
the mandatory mind control devices, a Dave can never safely return to
their home planets or families, but do enjoy limited inter-dimensional
time travel and reported shape shifting.

So we’re sure you will understand that “few are called and fewer are
chosen”. Therefore you must ever silently await your notification
while simultaneously divesting your long-term CONFIRMED membership
with the “Bad Guys”. Future unauthorized posts as follows will render
your request for limited observer status, permanently null and void.

Inappropriate demands for posts
Any and all nym shifting
Communications & associations with any and all Bad Guys
Unauthorized & inappropriate identity demands
Misappropriating posts of others
Mental excursions from the real world
Leadership or member claims in Good Guys
Posting any full texts where URLs clearly exist
Other deviant behaviors and wrong doing as identified by Them

Beware! They have recorded your entire life and forever monitor you
through multiple body implants.

The Malware Community Cabal

nha