Maybe there is a certificate-trust issue that can be
tweaked on the Mac side.
Maybe the HTTP header is not being sufficently unwrapped
on the Mac side, or it can't be unwrapped fast enough on
the Mac side and the error defaults to "Security
failure...". Or vice-versa on the web server side.
Is the web server exactly the same (NT/Win2K/Win2K3)
between your application versions? Is the certificate
exactly the same? Just to rule out low-level issues, you
might want to install the ASP site on one IP number and
ASP.NET on another IP number and switch between them to
make sure that it is ASP.NET that is actually causing the
issue.
Assuming that it is in fact ASP.NET, are you using
cookies or sessions? Those state mechanisms have to put
information into the HTTP header. Using cookieless
sessions (my favorite) or strict ViewState might solve
your problem, as they transfer state info wholly in the
GET and HTTP body.
Are you using ASP.NET Forms Authentication or a custom
implementation? Perhaps either (especially the default
cookie-using method of Forms Auth) is not translating
something over SSL.
Hope that helps.
>-----Original Message-----
>Greetings,
>I'm hoping someone has experienced a problem I'm having:
>
>I have an existing ASP application (working fine) that
>uses an SSL server certificate. My user community is
made
>up of both PC's and Macintosh computers.
>
>I've re-written this application in ASP.NET for a number
>of reasons and now find that my Mac users are having
>problems with the application. SSL works just fine for
PC
>users, won't work for Mac users (browser is Internet
>Explorer). When a Mac user tries to login to my
>application using SSL (https://) the browser produces an
>error saying "Security failure, a secure connection
could
>not be established". Mac users can use the site/app
>without SSL (http://)
>
>This is the same server and site and server certificate
>that was used with the ASP app. Is there a problem
>using "server.transfer()" when SSL is part of the
>equation? Any special web.config issues?
>
>I'm truly stumped on this one... Thanks so much for any
>assistance.
>
>Bob Skutnick
>
>
>.
>