In message <552e47de-5e83-4bab-
ba7c->, thingy wrote:
> On Jun 25, 10:36 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek-
> central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
>> As much as Novell's Linux business has been growing, Red Hat is doing
>> even better
>> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/25/redhat_fq12010_numbers/>.
>>
>> Looks like the recession really is encouraging people to move away from
>> proprietary software towards free/open-source solutions.
>
> There is little free/open source about RedHat...
It's _all_ free/open source. You can get exactly the same software package
for free from outfits like CentOS.
> ... you pay quite heavily for a Redhat OS.....
You pay for their support. That's all you pay for.
> what is interesting is that Vmware now support
> Debian, Ubuntu and FreeBSD....there must be enough interest in these
> to justify that support.
So Red Hat doesn't own the market. So what? Plenty of room for all.
> For myself, I think you are thinking at the wrong level....OSes are
> not that important, what is important is the application you need or
> are prepared to pay for ...
All software is ultimately a commodity. That applies to apps as well as the
OS, drivers, whatever. The only thing worth paying for is the support,
because that's the only scarce good.