Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > VHDL
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

VHDL - Anyone can check if XST v11 has fixed this bug ?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2009, 11:56 PM   #1
Default Anyone can check if XST v11 has fixed this bug ?


Hello,

I stumbled on yet another XST VHDL bug in v 10.1, & haven't had time to
install the new v11. I would appreciate if someone could tell me if
this bug is still there (I would have to modify our obfuscator just for
XST, something I'd prefer not do). Thanx.
Bert

Here is the (correct) code :

-- XST_TESTCASE.vhd
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-- another XST Issue (tested on version 10.1)
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-- Author : Bert CUZEAU
-- Contact :
-- Web : http://www.alse-fr.com
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------
-- Bug : XST fails when an extended Identifier
-- is used in an enumeration
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Library IEEE;
use IEEE.std_logic_1164.all;

-- ----------------------------------------------
Entity TEST is
-- ----------------------------------------------
Port ( CLK : in std_logic; -- System Clock at Fqxtal
RST : in std_logic; -- Asynchronous Reset active high
Dout : out std_logic );--
end entity TEST;

-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Architecture RTL of TEST is
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Type State_t is (Idle,\Shift__TX\);
signal State : State_t;
-----\
Begin --
-----/
Dout <= '1' when State=\Shift__TX\ else '0';
-- --------------------------
-- State Machine
-- --------------------------
process (RST, CLK)
begin
if RST='1' then
State <= Idle;
elsif rising_edge(CLK) then
case State is
when Idle =>
State <= \Shift__TX\;
when \Shift__TX\ =>
State <= Idle;
end case;
end if;
end process;
end RTL;




Bert_Paris
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 09:53 AM   #2
HT-Lab
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anyone can check if XST v11 has fixed this bug ?

"Bert_Paris" <do_not_spam_@me> wrote in message
news:4a285116$0$294$...
> Hello,
>
> I stumbled on yet another XST VHDL bug in v 10.1, & haven't had time to
> install the new v11. I would appreciate if someone could tell me if this
> bug is still there (I would have to modify our obfuscator just for XST,
> something I'd prefer not do). Thanx.
> Bert
>
> Here is the (correct) code :
>
> -- XST_TESTCASE.vhd
> -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
> -- another XST Issue (tested on version 10.1)
> -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
> -- Author : Bert CUZEAU
> -- Contact :
> -- Web : http://www.alse-fr.com
> -- -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -- Bug : XST fails when an extended Identifier
> -- is used in an enumeration
> -- -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Library IEEE;
> use IEEE.std_logic_1164.all;
>
> -- ----------------------------------------------
> Entity TEST is
> -- ----------------------------------------------
> Port ( CLK : in std_logic; -- System Clock at Fqxtal
> RST : in std_logic; -- Asynchronous Reset active high
> Dout : out std_logic );--
> end entity TEST;
>
> -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Architecture RTL of TEST is
> -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Type State_t is (Idle,\Shift__TX\);
> signal State : State_t;
> -----\
> Begin --
> -----/
> Dout <= '1' when State=\Shift__TX\ else '0';
> -- --------------------------
> -- State Machine
> -- --------------------------
> process (RST, CLK)
> begin
> if RST='1' then
> State <= Idle;
> elsif rising_edge(CLK) then
> case State is
> when Idle =>
> State <= \Shift__TX\;
> when \Shift__TX\ =>
> State <= Idle;
> end case;
> end if;
> end process;
> end RTL;
>


I will have a go at it give that it is raining again in the UK

Using 11.1 I get:

ERROR:HDLParsers:3312 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 31. Undefined symbol
'\Shift__TX\'.
ERROR:HDLParsers:1209 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 31. \Shift__TX\: Undefined
symbol (last report in this block)
ERROR:HDLParsers:813 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 41. Enumerated value
\shift__tx\ is missing in case.
-->

Total memory usage is 126028 kilobytes

Number of errors : 3 ( 0 filtered)
Number of warnings : 0 ( 0 filtered)
Number of infos : 0 ( 0 filtered)

Hans
www.ht-lab.com






HT-Lab
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 10:32 AM   #3
HT-Lab
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anyone can check if XST v11 has fixed this bug ?

"Jonathan Bromley" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:53:19 +0100, "HT-Lab" wrote:
>
>>I will have a go at it give that it is raining again in the UK

>
> And because of the rain, I'm supposed to be tidying the
> filing cabinet; and because of that, I'm reading Usenet
>
>>Using 11.1 I get:
>>
>>ERROR:HDLParsers:3312 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 31. Undefined symbol
>>'\Shift__TX\'.
>>ERROR:HDLParsers:1209 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 31. \Shift__TX\:
>>Undefined
>>symbol (last report in this block)
>>ERROR:HDLParsers:813 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 41. Enumerated value
>>\shift__tx\ is missing in case.

>
> Ahah. So it seems that XST is flattening uppercase letters
> in the escaped-identifier to lowercase, but not everywhere.
> It would be interesting to try the same testcase with the
> identifier name changed to \shift__tx\ (all lowercase).


You are right!

================================================== =======================
* HDL Compilation *
================================================== =======================
Compiling vhdl file "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" in Library test_lib.
Architecture rtl of Entity test is up to date.

Reading constraint file D:/test_lib/TEST.xcf.
XCF parsing done.
....
Number of errors : 0 ( 0 filtered)
Number of warnings : 0 ( 0 filtered)
Number of infos : 0 ( 0 filtered)

www.ht-lab.com
Hans

>
> Sorry, I don't yet have ISE11 installed at home;
> it will need a *very* long spell of rain before I do that
> --
> Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
>
> DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
> VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services
>
> Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
>
> http://www.MYCOMPANY.com
>
> The contents of this message may contain personal views which
> are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.





HT-Lab
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 11:47 AM   #4
HT-Lab
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anyone can check if XST v11 has fixed this bug ?
"Jonathan Bromley" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:53:19 +0100, "HT-Lab" wrote:
>
>>I will have a go at it give that it is raining again in the UK

>
> And because of the rain, I'm supposed to be tidying the
> filing cabinet; and because of that, I'm reading Usenet
>
>>Using 11.1 I get:
>>
>>ERROR:HDLParsers:3312 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 31. Undefined symbol
>>'\Shift__TX\'.
>>ERROR:HDLParsers:1209 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 31. \Shift__TX\:
>>Undefined
>>symbol (last report in this block)
>>ERROR:HDLParsers:813 - "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" Line 41. Enumerated value
>>\shift__tx\ is missing in case.

>
> Ahah. So it seems that XST is flattening uppercase letters
> in the escaped-identifier to lowercase, but not everywhere.
> It would be interesting to try the same testcase with the
> identifier name changed to \shift__tx\ (all lowercase).


You are right!

================================================== =======================
* HDL Compilation *
================================================== =======================
Compiling vhdl file "D:/test_lib/x.vhd" in Library test_lib.
Architecture rtl of Entity test is up to date.

Reading constraint file D:/test_lib/TEST.xcf.
XCF parsing done.
....
Number of errors : 0 ( 0 filtered)
Number of warnings : 0 ( 0 filtered)
Number of infos : 0 ( 0 filtered)

www.ht-lab.com
Hans

>
> Sorry, I don't yet have ISE11 installed at home;
> it will need a *very* long spell of rain before I do that
> --
> Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
>
> DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
> VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services
>
> Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
>
> http://www.MYCOMPANY.com
>
> The contents of this message may contain personal views which
> are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.






HT-Lab
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 12:42 PM   #5
Bert_Paris
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anyone can check if XST v11 has fixed this bug ?
Thanks everyone !
FYI, it's raining in Paris too , but sunny in Normandy
This bug is bad news since our obfuscator produces "all-uppercased"
code. I'll have to modify it...
Bert




Bert_Paris
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mcse,Mcsa,Mcitp,Mcts,Mcdst,Mcpd @Home..Without Tests And Study(PayAfter Check Results on MCP Site) cert_king1@yahoo.com MCITP 0 01-23-2009 09:38 AM
Obatin MCSE,CCNA,CCNP,ORACLE,JAVA And Many More Certs WithoutExams..Pay After Check Results..100% Passing Gaurantee certexpert MCTS 0 01-16-2009 12:41 PM
Obatin MCSE,CCNA,CCNP,ORACLE,JAVA And Many More Certs WithoutExams..Pay After Check Results..100% Passing Gaurantee EXAMSATHOME MCTS 0 12-26-2008 09:47 AM
Obatin MCSE,CCNA,CCNP,ORACLE,JAVA And Many More Certs WithoutExams..Pay After Check Results..100% Passing Gaurantee EXAMSATHOME MCITP 0 12-26-2008 09:10 AM
100% Pass Without Exams Microsoft,Cisco,Comptia,Oracle,Sun,Java,CwnpAnd Many More( Pay After Check Results) ExamsAtHome MCITP 0 12-07-2008 10:56 AM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46