Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > XML > appendChild & cloneNode

Reply
Thread Tools

appendChild & cloneNode

 
 
David Mark
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-03-2009
On Jun 3, 3:39*am, Jorge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 9:00*am, Garrett Smith <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > (...)
> > Yes, and LOL funny.
> > (...)

>
> LOL and funny ? That wasn't supposed to be funny, or did you see any
> smiley ? That's pathetic and pitiful for a *JAVASCRIPT* FAQ...


No, it is pathetic and pitiful that you can't use Google.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tim Streater
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-03-2009
In article
<(E-Mail Removed)>,
David Mark <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> On Jun 3, 3:39*am, Jorge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > On Jun 3, 9:00*am, Garrett Smith <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:


> > LOL and funny ? That wasn't supposed to be funny, or did you see any
> > smiley ? That's pathetic and pitiful for a *JAVASCRIPT* FAQ...

>
> No, it is pathetic and pitiful that you can't use Google.


Snip, snip, snip, snip, snip, ...

--
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
RobG
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-03-2009
On Jun 3, 4:55*pm, Jorge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 3:00*am, RobG <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > (...)
> > In any case, if you think an item on JSON is required, write one and
> > post it here for review and possible inclusion in the FAQ.

>
> Again ? Ok, here it goes:
>
> On Jun 1, 12:01 pm, Jorge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *FAQ Topic - What online resources are available?
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> >http://crockford.com/javascript/

>
> > JSON:http://www.JSON.org/


That is not a suitable FAQ entry. Would you be happy if the entire FAQ
was reduced to links to ECMA-262 and the W3C DOM pages?


> > JSLINT:http://www.JSLint.com/
> > JSMIN:http://javascript.crockford.com/jsmin.html
> > JSMIN:http://fmarcia.info/jsmin/test.html
> > (...)


Perhaps you would. The above links have nothing to do with JSON, why
would that be part of a JSON FAQ entry?

Firstly you have to work out what the question is - since there aren't
any asked here specifically about JSON, you'll have to make one up.
The answer should briefly explain what JSON is and how to use it.
Lastly, include a link to json.org. Perhaps you could also write a
longer article that could be linked to the notes pages and shows how
to use JSON in an XMLHttpRequest response.

If you aren't prepared to do that, there likely won't be a JSON entry
as there seems to be little enthusiasm to answer a question that no
one has asked.


--
Rob
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jorge
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-03-2009
On Jun 3, 2:25*pm, RobG <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > On Jun 1, 12:01 pm, Jorge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > *FAQ Topic - What online resources are available?
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> > > JSON:http://www.JSON.org/

>
> That is not a suitable FAQ entry. Would you be happy if the entire FAQ
> was reduced to links to ECMA-262 and the W3C DOM pages?
>
> (...)


Mr. G.,

There's an "online resources" section in the FAQ... and a link to
json.org fits there perfectly. It ought to be there already:

http://jibbering.com/faq/#onlineResources

but it isn't.

--
Jorge.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Johannes Koch
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-03-2009
Jorge schrieb:

> There's an "online resources" section in the FAQ... and a link to
> json.org fits there perfectly. It ought to be there already:
>
> http://jibbering.com/faq/#onlineResources
>
> but it isn't.


The FAQ for comp.lang.javascript is not a suitable discussion topic for
comp.text.xml. So please discuss this on comp.lang.javascript only.

--
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
(Te Deum, 4th cent.)
 
Reply With Quote
 
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-03-2009
Garrett Smith wrote:
> Garrett Smith wrote:
>> Jorge wrote:
>>> On Jun 2, 10:11 pm, David Mark <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> [...]
>>> "Your search - site:jibbering.com/faq/ json - did not match any
>>> documents."
>>>
>>> Pathetic, pitiful...
>>>

>> Yes, and LOL funny.
>>
>> Make sure that you type the search term criteria first, before the site
>> filter.
>>
>> Like this:-
>> json site:jibbering.com/
>>

>
> It does seem to work the other way, too. Guess it isn't funny after all.
> Just annoying.


Since when do URI( references)s work with Google's `site:' parameter in the
first place?


PointedEars
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
appendChild & cloneNode Chameleon Javascript 26 06-03-2009 07:03 PM
cloneNode/appendChild and children Olorin Javascript 4 05-03-2007 01:16 AM
Is xml.dom.minidom.Element.cloneNode(deep=True) really fixed already? Sullivan WxPyQtKinter Python 0 03-14-2006 01:17 AM
.Net validators broken by client-side script (cloneNode does not copy onchange handler) =?Utf-8?B?TW9ua2V5Qm95?= ASP .Net 2 06-05-2004 11:56 PM
XmlDocument and cloneNode itsme ASP .Net Building Controls 0 10-14-2003 04:13 AM



Advertisments