Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > NZ Computing > Avoiding The VFAT Patent

Reply
Thread Tools

Avoiding The VFAT Patent

 
 
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-18-2009
Some IBM folks have proposed a Linux kernel patch to optionally remove the
ability to create files with long names on VFAT volumes. This is presumably
to get around Microsoft's patent, with which it sued TomTom.

However, the people proposing the patch haven't exactly been forthcoming
about explaining why the patch is necessary, or how it fixes the problem.
Could they be doing this on legal advice? In any case, the result is that
the patch is being less than warmly received by the Linux kernel community.

<http://lwn.net/Articles/331615/>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If A Patent Is A Monopoly, Then A Patent Pool Is A Cartel Lawrence D'Oliveiro NZ Computing 1 10-31-2010 04:23 AM
He Who Lives By The Software Patent, Dies By The Software Patent Lawrence D'Oliveiro NZ Computing 1 08-31-2010 08:35 AM
VFAT + Linux/Knoppix bug? lbrtchx@hotmail.com Java 3 05-08-2007 07:18 AM
VFAT Device Initialization Failed Error after HP 7310 xi printer installation Coleen Computer Support 1 02-19-2005 10:17 PM
Patent granted for "system on a chip" framework? y_p_w VHDL 9 08-07-2003 11:50 PM



Advertisments