I appreciate the comment but the requirements were really double checked and
fully understood.
Not that it matters but it includes a number of test components and scripts
that I plan to incorporate into some of my Websites when time allows. I just
found that it would provide some benefit if I could view what I had so far
each morning, until I go on to develop some of those other things I have
planned.
Now, I haven't done much HTML with WebForms. So perhaps there is some
functionality there that would be worth playing with. But it working so well
now, it would be hard to justify a rewrite just for my current purposes.
(BTW, I just stuck the code on one of my Web sites and placed a shortcut on
the desktop. It's not slick but it works.)
Thanks.
Jonathan
"Patrice" <http://www.chez.com/scribe/> wrote in message
news

8EE5565-1EF7-4BCE-BB41-...
> Definitely or you could perhaps use Cassini
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassini_Web_Server).
>
> Also next time, really double check your requirements i.e. an application
> that should run on a desktop machine is likely better done as a Windows
> application. A web application is mostly done for those who must *not* run
> on the user side...
>
> (i.e the benefit is that this is no deployment application because all is
> done server side but of course if you want to make it run locally then you
> are back at a windows application and actually even likely worse as you
> need a local web server).
>
> --
> Patrice
>
>
>
>