Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > 3550 Flash Files

Reply
Thread Tools

3550 Flash Files

 
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-17-2009
I just got a used 3550 and see a number of files in flash:

Directory of flash:/

2 -rwx 322 Mar 1 1993 00:02:24 +00:00 system_env_vars
3 -rwx 3721 Mar 1 1993 00:06:22 +00:00 config.text
4 -rwx 187 Mar 12 1993 02:38:15 +00:00 layout.text
5 drwx 0 Mar 1 1993 02:10:37 +00:00 lost+found
6 -rwx 121 Mar 12 1993 00:29:11 +00:00 layoutOption.txt
8 -rwx 0 Mar 1 1993 00:02:24 +00:00 env_vars
7 -rwx 24 Mar 1 1993 00:06:22 +00:00
private-config.text
24 -rwx 7134015 Mar 1 1993 00:15:51 +00:00
c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin


What are layout.text and layoutOption.txt?
3550#more layout.text
CISCOKID001;__network_root_node__,-1000,-1000,true;0009.b7e1.3100,59,18,false;ecs44h2,-1000,-1000,true;0009.b7e1.f800,379,27,false;0009.e811.74 00,223,25,false;0009.b79c.9f80,221,216,false

3550#more layoutOption.txt
IPPhone:true,HName:true,LinkSpeed:true,IPAddr:true ,AP:true,CPE:true,Candidate:true,IName:true,Neighb or:true,MACAddr:false


Why are there two entries with zero bytes: the lost+found directory
and env_vars?

What is private-config.text and why can I not display the contents?
3550#more private-config.text
%Error opening flash:/private-config.text (Permission denied)
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Doug McIntyre
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-17-2009
Bob <> writes:
>What are layout.text and layoutOption.txt?


IIRC, something from the web based switch manager that must have been
deleted off your flash at a later time. The old one was pretty bad.
The newer one is passable, but I think thats only available in
switches newer than that model.

>Why are there two entries with zero bytes: the lost+found directory
>and env_vars?


In Unix (which clearly has influenced IOS in many ways), lost+found
is the directory on the file system where recovered/damaged &
recovered files are placed after a fsck. Probably never used on
Cisco.

env_vars hold variables between reboots. I believe the function of
this has changed over the years, and is no longer needed, but is still there.

>What is private-config.text and why can I not display the contents?
>3550#more private-config.text
>%Error opening flash:/private-config.text (Permission denied)


Private data to the switch that Cisco doesn't want you to see.
I suspect there could be some licensing there for some models..

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bob
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-20-2009
On 17 Apr 2009 18:52:11 GMT, Doug McIntyre <> wrote:

>Bob <> writes:
>>What are layout.text and layoutOption.txt?

>
>IIRC, something from the web based switch manager that must have been
>deleted off your flash at a later time. The old one was pretty bad.
>The newer one is passable, but I think thats only available in
>switches newer than that model.
>
>>Why are there two entries with zero bytes: the lost+found directory
>>and env_vars?

>
>In Unix (which clearly has influenced IOS in many ways), lost+found
>is the directory on the file system where recovered/damaged &
>recovered files are placed after a fsck. Probably never used on
>Cisco.
>
>env_vars hold variables between reboots. I believe the function of
>this has changed over the years, and is no longer needed, but is still there.
>
>>What is private-config.text and why can I not display the contents?
>>3550#more private-config.text
>>%Error opening flash:/private-config.text (Permission denied)

>
>Private data to the switch that Cisco doesn't want you to see.
>I suspect there could be some licensing there for some models..


I don't care about browser-based management so I'd like to delete the
layout files. Can you think of any reason not to erase them and the
zero byte file and directory as well?

Or to put it another way, does the switch need anything besides an
image file (and maybe system_env_vars) to run?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Doug McIntyre
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-20-2009
Bob <> writes:
>I don't care about browser-based management so I'd like to delete the
>layout files. Can you think of any reason not to erase them and the
>zero byte file and directory as well?


I would think the layout files are totally fine to wipe.

I wouldn't try to remove the other files that are always there.
There could be some boot code detection looking for those, even if
they aren't used.

>Or to put it another way, does the switch need anything besides an
>image file (and maybe system_env_vars) to run?


Err, why? Its not like there's alot of stuff happening there anyway.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cisco 3550 flash got erased..need help zocon Cisco 1 03-22-2012 04:37 AM
Re: Differences between 3550-24-SMI and 3550-24-EMI Steinar Haug Cisco 0 10-20-2003 02:59 PM
Differences between 3550-24-SMI and 3550-24-EMI JohnNews Cisco 10 10-20-2003 12:33 PM
Catalyst 3550 EMI Upgrade Kit (CD-3550-EMI=) problem! show version = SMI desdronox Cisco 1 07-10-2003 02:08 AM
Sniffer on 3550 Sam Soh Cisco 1 06-23-2003 07:21 AM



Advertisments