Hi Jack
I use Zone Alarm firewall and Avast AV. In addition I use Spybot to
"immunize" - which I believe adds items to the hosts file. I also run both
Spybot and Ad-aware every so often but all they find are a few cookies. For
browsing I use Firefox which I believe Spybot does something to during the
"immunize" process. My Firefox cookies screen has a list of websites from
where cookies are automatically blocked. Maybe that is doing what the large
hosts file is doing.
I have not really had any real problems (no banners or similar) and I am
therefore not sure I really need that large Hosts file I got from the
mvps.org site, but then I am no expert. I thought using that hosts file
might be cost free safety, but it so slowed down things that I needed to
follow their advice and disable the DNS Client service. So now I wonder
whether it might not be smarter to just go back to the way things were:
smaller hosts file and restore DNS Client service.
Does that make sense?
Jeff
Jack [MVP-Networking] wrote:
> Hi
> Knowing the content of the Host File in question, as an alternative,
> you can find (easy, and even free) ways to use Software Firewalls and
> browser's Ad-blocking add-ons, thus reduce significantly the HOST's
> file size, or eliminate it all together.
> Jack (MS, MVP-Networking)
>
> <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> I have a large hosts file
>> (which I obtained from http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm )
>> in my XP Media Center laptop and it really slows down my internet
>> access. This apparently is a known
>> problem in XP. To remedy it, the above site recommends disabling
>> the DNS Client service.
>>
>> Is that really safe or wise to do?
>>
>> As long as I am at home, is there any harmful effect from this?
>>
>> Why would it speed up internet access (if it will)?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jeff