Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Claimed high scanned film "information" is mostly garbage

Reply
Thread Tools

Claimed high scanned film "information" is mostly garbage

 
 
nospam
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-06-2009
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Chris Malcolm
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> > We spent $20 mil on a digital system and went BACK to film as it
> > didn't have resolution or contrast of film.

>
> You spent $20M on a digital system and *then* discovered that film had
> so much better resolution and contrast for your purposes that you went
> back to film?
>
> Sounds like there must have been a very serious disconnection between
> the technical experts and the folk in charge of the money! Or possibly
> even an absence of technical experts. They're well known to be
> expensive and to have a nasty habit of raising annoying objections to
> the plans of management to give lucrative contracts to their good
> friends.


or it's a troll.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: adding exif data to scanned film nospam Digital Photography 4 11-01-2009 07:54 PM
Re: adding exif data to scanned film Keith Nuttle Digital Photography 1 10-30-2009 06:24 PM
Nikon S10 - zoom range less than claimed? Marty Fremen Digital Photography 4 11-21-2007 09:13 AM
Bizarre New Invention Claimed To Induce Psychic Powers. Aurum Solis HTML 2 09-23-2006 09:49 AM
After having 8mm film reels digitally archived, film looks very grainy/ filled with static. Is this digital-looking noise normal? + more 8mm film questions Phil Edry Digital Photography 11 10-10-2004 11:57 PM



Advertisments