On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:10:11 +1300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<_zealand> wrote:
>In message <>, Stephen Worthington
>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:20:32 +1300, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> <_zealand> wrote:
>>
>>>In message <>, Stephen
>>>Worthington wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is personal property if you buy the tickets in order to go to the
>>>> event, then through unforeseen circumstances can not go and have to
>>>> sell them. In which case the tickets should be on sold for the face
>>>> value plus handling costs.
>>>
>>>Who gets the right to impose conditions on other people's property?
>>
>> The law. In quite a few countries, scalping is illegal. In other
>> places, the terms of sale for tickets are supposed to prevent
>> scalping. That apparently is not very effective.
>
>So the laws against scalping are not very effective. Could that be because
>they're trying to hold back powerful market forces?
>
>>>> But the scalper scumbags buy up as many tickets as they can get their
>>>> hands on at the legitimate price, preventing legitimate customers from
>>>> getting them, then re-sell them at a huge profit.
>>>
>>>Could that be because the ticket price is too low?
>>
>> Not normally. Scalping happens more on high priced events than low
>> priced ones.
>
>If the scalpers aren't greatly increasing the price, then what's the
>problem?
They frequently double the price, or more. And even if they were
selling them at cost, you would still have to find a scalper to buy
from, rather than going to a regular ticket agency. And I really
doubt that a scalper would be able to be found again if something went
wrong and you wanted to use your Consumer Guarantees Act rights.
|