«

I am with BT and I feel I am paying too much. I have looked at Virgin
Net and they seem much cheaper but there are so many ways prices can
be inflated after the switch has been made. All I want is BB and a
telephone. How much a month will Virgin Net cost me?
http://www.oss.org.uk

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:48:40 GMT, Jono <>
wrote:

>soolie was thinking very hard :
>> I am with BT and I feel I am paying too much. I have looked at Virgin
>> Net and they seem much cheaper but there are so many ways prices can
>> be inflated after the switch has been made. All I want is BB and a
>> telephone. How much a month will Virgin Net cost me?
>> http://www.oss.org.uk
>
>It will cost you your sanity

Are they still as bad as when they were called NTL then?

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:52 GMT, Jono <>
wrote:

>soolie formulated the question :
>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:48:40 GMT, Jono <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> soolie was thinking very hard :
>>>> I am with BT and I feel I am paying too much. I have looked at Virgin
>>>> Net and they seem much cheaper but there are so many ways prices can
>>>> be inflated after the switch has been made. All I want is BB and a
>>>> telephone. How much a month will Virgin Net cost me?
>>>> http://www.oss.org.uk
>>>
>>> It will cost you your sanity
>>
>> Are they still as bad as when they were called NTL then?
>
>Worse.

Worse than BT?

I have been with um ages..No probs my end.

"soolie" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:52 GMT, Jono <>
> wrote:
>
>>soolie formulated the question :
>>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:48:40 GMT, Jono <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> soolie was thinking very hard :
>>>>> I am with BT and I feel I am paying too much. I have looked at Virgin
>>>>> Net and they seem much cheaper but there are so many ways prices can
>>>>> be inflated after the switch has been made. All I want is BB and a
>>>>> telephone. How much a month will Virgin Net cost me?
>>>>> http://www.oss.org.uk
>>>>
>>>> It will cost you your sanity
>>>
>>> Are they still as bad as when they were called NTL then?
>>
>>Worse.
>
> Worse than BT?

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:01:51 -0000, Barnze wrote:

> I have been with um ages..No probs my end.
>
Me too. I'm on 2Mbps and that's what I get.
--
Jim S
Tyneside UK
www.jimscott.co.uk

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:19:14 +0000, Jim S wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:01:51 -0000, Barnze wrote:
>
>> I have been with um ages..No probs my end.
>>
> Me too. I'm on 2Mbps and that's what I get.

We're on up to 10Mbps. Last week I did a speed test online in the evening
and it turned out that my download speed at that time was 11 point
something. I was reasonably pleased .



--
The month of March in this year of 2009 sees the centenary of the laying
of the keel of the most famous (or infamous) ocean liner of all time, RMS
Titanic, at Harland & Wolff shipyard in Belfast.
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Titanic>

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:43:36 +0000, Jono wrote:

> Aardvark explained :
>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:19:14 +0000, Jim S wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:01:51 -0000, Barnze wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have been with um ages..No probs my end.
>>>>
>>> Me too. I'm on 2Mbps and that's what I get.
>>
>> We're on up to 10Mbps. Last week I did a speed test online in the
>> evening and it turned out that my download speed at that time was 11
>> point something. I was reasonably pleased .
>
> You IP shows that you are not with Virgin.net;

I am.

> you're on cable, not ADSL

I am.

>
> cpc3-runc3-0-0-cust594.bagu.cable.ntl.com

Yep,that's me.





--
The month of March in this year of 2009 sees the centenary of the laying
of the keel of the most famous (or infamous) ocean liner of all time, RMS
Titanic, at Harland & Wolff shipyard in Belfast.
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Titanic>