Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a camera phone?)

Reply
Thread Tools

Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a camera phone?)

 
 
RichA
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-06-2009
What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
printed on canvas and rephotographed.

http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9...2570fb0048e952

The photo:

http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bigguy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-06-2009
RichA wrote:
> What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
> printed on canvas and rephotographed.
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9...2570fb0048e952
>
> The photo:
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg

Could just be high ISO noise?

Guy
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Nomen Nescio
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-06-2009
Since you asked, Re: Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a camera
phone?)

Exif IFD0

* Camera Make = Canon
* Camera Model = Canon PowerShot A700
* Picture Orientation = normal (1)
* X-Resolution = 180/1 = 180
* Y-Resolution = 180/1 = 180
* X/Y-Resolution Unit = inch (2)
* Last Modified Date/Time = 2006:03:14 11:05:15
* Y/Cb/Cr Positioning (Subsampling) = centered / center of pixel array
(1)

Exif Sub IFD

* Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/60 second = 0.01667 second
* Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 35/10 = F3.5
* Exif Version = 0220
* Original Date/Time = 2006:03:14 11:05:15
* Digitization Date/Time = 2006:03:14 11:05:15
* Components Configuration = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
* Compressed Bits per Pixel = 5/1 = 5
* Shutter Speed Value (APEX) = 189/32
Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/59.97 second
* Aperture Value (APEX) = 116/32
Aperture = F3.51
* Exposure Bias (EV) = 0/3 = 0
* Max Aperture Value (APEX) = 116/32 = 3.63
Max Aperture = F3.51
* Metering Mode = pattern / multi-segment (5)
* Flash = Flash fired, auto mode, red-eye reduction mode
* Focal Length = 13159/1000 mm = 13.16 mm
* Maker Note =


"RichA" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
> printed on canvas and rephotographed.
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9...2570fb0048e952
>
> The photo:
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg



 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul Furman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-06-2009
RichA wrote:
> What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
> printed on canvas and rephotographed.
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9...2570fb0048e952


Try this link:
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b...2575600048b4b1
"Picture taken with: Analogue rangefinder camera with
Planar T* 2/50 ZM"


> The photo:
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg



--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam
 
Reply With Quote
 
John A.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-07-2009
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:34:22 -0800, Paul Furman <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>RichA wrote:
>> What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
>> printed on canvas and rephotographed.
>>
>> http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9...2570fb0048e952

>
>Try this link:
>http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b...2575600048b4b1
>"Picture taken with: Analogue rangefinder camera with
>Planar T* 2/50 ZM"


So, given that claim, and the differing information in the EXIF, is
the jpeg posted on the site actually a noisy picture OF the entry? Was
the entry even a digital shot?

>> The photo:
>>
>> http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg


 
Reply With Quote
 
DRS
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-07-2009
"Paul Furman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:IUlsl.19453$(E-Mail Removed)
> John A. wrote:


[...]

>> So, given that claim, and the differing information in the EXIF, is
>> the jpeg posted on the site actually a noisy picture OF the entry?
>> Was the entry even a digital shot?

>
> Analog rangefinder means film.


Moreover, I couldn't find the EXIF data given earlier in the image itself.


 
Reply With Quote
 
John A.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-07-2009
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:18:34 +1100, "DRS" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>"Paul Furman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:IUlsl.19453$(E-Mail Removed)
>> John A. wrote:

>
>[...]
>
>>> So, given that claim, and the differing information in the EXIF, is
>>> the jpeg posted on the site actually a noisy picture OF the entry?
>>> Was the entry even a digital shot?

>>
>> Analog rangefinder means film.

>
>Moreover, I couldn't find the EXIF data given earlier in the image itself.
>


Huh! You're right!

Compression - 1 (None)
ImageDescription - Das Gewinnerbild von Colin Jones, USA.
Winning image of Mr. Colin Jones, USA.
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - Adobe Photoshop 7.0
DateTime - 2009:02:23 13:34:34
YCbCrPositioning - Centered
Copyright - Foto: Carl Zeiss/Photo: Courtesy of Carl Zeiss
ExifOffset - 328
SubsecTime - 406
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 1818
ExifImageHeight - 1228

Thumbnail: -
Compression - 6 (JPG)
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 478
JpegIFByteCount - 3561

I wonder what image Nomen was reading.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Chris Malcolm
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-07-2009
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Rich <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> "Nomen Nescio" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:gorata$ctr$(E-Mail Removed):


>> Since you asked, Re: Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a
>> camera phone?)
>>
>> Exif IFD0
>>
>> * Camera Make = Canon
>> * Camera Model = Canon PowerShot A700

>
> God, that explains it! It looked horrible.


It doesn't explain it. The "noise" being discussed, if that's what it
is, doesn't look at all like digital camera noise.

--
Chris Malcolm



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carl Zeiss Microscopy - New Onlineshop! CZ Micha Digital Photography 0 09-03-2007 11:21 PM
Sony Carl Zeiss 135mm f/1.7 -- too sharp for the Maxxum 7D Alan Browne Digital Photography 6 07-15-2007 06:46 PM
Digital Infrared Photography Competition February Winner and GrandPrize Winner Wayne J. Cosshall Digital Photography 2 04-13-2007 02:52 PM
Carl Zeiss 50mm 1.4 David Zou Digital Photography 8 06-29-2005 02:43 PM
Carl Zeiss Jena MC FLEKTOGON 2,4/35 M42 on ebay Andrea C Digital Photography 0 04-19-2005 03:19 PM



Advertisments