catchme wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>> ??w?f wrote:
>>>> In message <>, richard
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:15:29 -0500, "walter" <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-m...nvironment/849
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Talk about irony. ROFL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ain't it a shame? or - ain't it nice?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know who started this farce, but I'd just like to know how
>>>>> they came to this determination. After all, the earth's
>>>>> temperature has been nearly the same for a million years or more
>>>>> and these activists want you to believe that this devestation is
>>>>> going to happen next week or next year. Which they've been saying
>>>>> for 20 years or so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Their so called evidence is "the fact" that ice glaciers are
>>>>> melting more rapidly than they were eons ago. Like these people
>>>>> can back that up?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hell, I'm more worried about getting hit by a lightning bolt.
>>>> Your failure to understnad relative threats and immanent threats is
>>>> noted.
>>>>
>>>> Better leave the science to the scientists.
>>>>
>>>> ^_^
>>>>
>>>>
>> Would these be the same scientists in the 70s who warned of the
>> coming ice age due to global cooling and actually suggested
>> spreading soot on the ice caps to promote melting?
>>
>> Yeah the scientists are never wrong.
>>
>> Of course we know that which supports global warming supports global
>> warming, that which refutes global warming supports global warming,
>> anybody who speaks against global warming isn't qualified to speak
>> about global warming.
>>
>> If it's hot it's global warming, if it's cold it's global warming, if
>> there's a lot of storms it's global warming, if it's a quiet season
>> it's global warming.
>>
>> My suggestion would be if you're going to hold a global warming
>> rally at least wait till it's, oh I don't know, WARM!
>>
>> D
>>
>>
> those who are against global warming, are supported by big oil
> companies. This is not a mere supposition- I did a search on some of
> the largest deniers, who are published by the Heartland Institute,
> and then searched their financiers.
This of course makes sense. Considering that "big oil" (bad guy music)
stands to gain as much or more than any other industry during a worldwide
conversion to so called "green" technologies. Where exactly to you think the
billions of tons of feed stock (plastics, glass, rubber, steel, alloys,
electronics, lubricants) required for such a conversion come from? They all
are produced from or require for production (wait for it).... PETROLEUM.
After that we're about out anyway. "Big oil" (bad guy music) knows this.
Some say we've waited too long already. You like to "search on it." Do a
search on global peak oil.
> As to the blizzard phenomena- think on what happens to the bottom of a
> glass when the ice at the top begins to melt.
> Sooner or later, the glass- the Earth- will achieve parity, as the ice
> becomes smaller and moves farther south....
Ah yes the planet is just like a glass of ice. Of course I'm not qualified
to speak about global warming. (read above)
D
Similar Threads
