![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
MCTS - SQL Server 2005 Migration Assistant Autonumber problem. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
I am trying to migrate an Access 2003 database to SQL Server 2005 using the
SQL Server Migration Assistant for Access and am having various problems: 1. On one table, the migration gives the following on an autonumber field: A2SS0023: SQL Server Migration Assistant for Access Warning Message: Default value '0' added to target column (1), followed later on by A2SS0028: Auto-increment attribute of the column 'MSEQ' was not converted to Identity because the column has a default value. This table has about 80,000 records. 2. If I include another table in the migration, this one with 3.4 million records (hence our need to upgrade to SQL server 2005), I am getting a timeout error, even when I try to migrate the table by itself. I have verified that all timeout options are set to zero (unlimited time). Any suggestions would be appreciated. -- Larry J. West, MCSD, MCPD, MCTS: SQL Server 2005 [so yes, I should know the answer to this, but I don't], MOUS, FLMI, ACS LarryWestMCSD |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry, we don't have 2000, only 2005.
I assume the reason it doesn't work is that Access 2003 isn't compatible with 2005 since it came later, and running the upsizing wizard didn't work properly. Is there a free version of 2000 anywhere that I can temporarily download and use? -- Larry J. West, MCSD, MCPD, MCTS:SQL Server 2005, MOUS, FLMI, ACS "Jonathan Roberts" wrote: > LarryWestMCSD wrote: > > I am trying to migrate an Access 2003 database to SQL Server 2005 using the > > SQL Server Migration Assistant for Access and am having various problems: > > > > 1. On one table, the migration gives the following on an autonumber field: > > A2SS0023: SQL Server Migration Assistant for Access Warning Message: Default > > value '0' added to target column (1), followed later on by > > A2SS0028: Auto-increment attribute of the column 'MSEQ' was not converted to > > Identity because the column has a default value. > > > > This table has about 80,000 records. > > > > 2. If I include another table in the migration, this one with 3.4 million > > records (hence our need to upgrade to SQL server 2005), I am getting a > > timeout error, even when I try to migrate the table by itself. I have > > verified that all timeout options are set to zero (unlimited time). > > > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > > > -- Larry J. West, MCSD, MCPD, MCTS: SQL Server 2005 [so yes, I should know > > the answer to this, but I don't], MOUS, FLMI, ACS > > > > Larry, > > I should know also but don't as I haven't converted data to/from 2005 > yet. However, I did this numerous times under SQL 2000. Can you try > importing into 2000 and then moving to 2005? Is that an option for this > environment/project? > > Good luck... > > -- > Jonathan Roberts > MCTS: SQL Server 2005, MCP > > Information on MS VHD Images: http://tinyurl.com/y5bozl > Great MS Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/trika/default.aspx > Feedback on 70-431 Exam: http://www.jonathanroberts.eu/?p=6 > LarryWestMCSD |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Prerequisites 70-745 (Business Intelligence) | Valmont | MCITP | 3 | 06-24-2008 03:03 PM |
| SQL Server 2008 delayed into Q3 2008 | darrilgibson@cox.net | MCITP | 0 | 01-27-2008 10:26 PM |
| MCITP SQL Server 2005 or SQL Server 2008 | Darrilgibson@gmail.com | MCITP | 0 | 12-19-2007 01:56 PM |
| MCTS: SQL Server 2005 | Jason | MCITP | 1 | 05-09-2007 08:48 PM |
| Re: Need Ideas For A New Server, Long Post | Gareth Church | A+ Certification | 2 | 07-27-2003 12:46 PM |