Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > A+ Certification
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

A+ Certification - Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-27-2005, 11:40 PM   #1
Default Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself?


Hi again: Firewall: McAfee RULES OK!!! The McAfee firewall test says I am
invisible. XP SP2 is ok for folks that don't want to pay (I hope): As
regards XP SP1 quickest worm infection I have seen is 30 seconds during
connecting to diallup signup!!! Norton IS is a resource hog and increases
boot time by about a minute. Zone Alarm - not tried it but have mentioned it
to clients. PS. Have you tried explaining to retired folk that their new PC
out of the box for 2 days with non activated XP SP2 & NIS needs 20MB of MS
critical updates and 30MB NIS updates @ 4 minutes per MB @ your hourly rate?
I am getting more and more call outs from people who have bought a new PC
and don't know what to do next.
"smackedass" <> wrote in message
news:wk1ke.5465$ ink.net...
> Hello,
>
> Opinions, please:
>
> Is the XP firewall sufficient enough firewall protection, without using
> any other third-party products?
>
> Am only asking about firewall protection, not virus and spyware
> protection.
>
> Many of the new boxes from Dell, Compaq, and HP, that are running XP SP2,
> also have either McAfee Security or NIS 3-month subscriptions, and, apart
> from the virus protection that they provide, I don't know what the
> incentive is to buy a yearly subsription to either of these programs.
>
> I've been trying to figure out if Mcafee Security or NIS provide any
> better firewall protection than XP SP2.
>
> Then there the other products, most notably Zone Alarm.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks, in advance.
>
> smackedass
>





A
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2005, 03:19 AM   #2
AG
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself?

"A" <> wrote in message
news:d787lh$3rh$...
> Hi again: Firewall: McAfee RULES OK!!! The McAfee firewall test says I am
> invisible. XP SP2 is ok for folks that don't want to pay (I hope): As
> regards XP SP1 quickest worm infection I have seen is 30 seconds during
> connecting to diallup signup!!! Norton IS is a resource hog and increases
> boot time by about a minute. Zone Alarm - not tried it but have mentioned
> it to clients. PS. Have you tried explaining to retired folk that their
> new PC out of the box for 2 days with non activated XP SP2 & NIS needs
> 20MB of MS critical updates and 30MB NIS updates @ 4 minutes per MB @ your
> hourly rate? I am getting more and more call outs from people who have
> bought a new PC and don't know what to do next.


That's when you pop in your handy dandy MS CD with all the updates on it.
Takes minutes instead of hours.

AG




AG
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to activate Remote Assistance with XP using Windows Live Messenger Oziisr General Help Related Topics 0 02-01-2008 04:45 PM
Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? Eric Eastridge A+ Certification 1 06-18-2005 09:08 PM
Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? Andrew A+ Certification 7 05-24-2005 05:13 PM
Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? Tom MacIntyre A+ Certification 0 05-23-2005 03:23 PM
Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? MF A+ Certification 0 05-23-2005 04:54 AM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46