![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
A+ Certification - Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
howdy
get zone alarm - even an old version will do - or sygate personal firewall, both free, and relatively easy to configure. you don't need a router. you can leave your computer running for days with the broadband connection on, no problem. or, with these firewalls, you can leave it running with all traffic on your internet interface blocked - with zone alarm it's so easy, right click left click, done, that i would recommend it if you need to shut off your AV auto protect often to install stuff. ZA or Sygate will stop everything --EXCEPT -- scumware of any sort installed over your http connection to a website. remember, after you open that http connection stuff that comes in over it is interpreted as a response to your request. and so such things will also penetrate routers doing NAT. these nasties include spyware, trojans, etc., from evil sites. however, ZA and Sygate will alert you of said scumware if it tries to call home. i can tell you absolutely that those two things work with very minimal updates or worry, so i would forget the ms firewall for the moment. an added advantage, learn to configure firewalls and you will learn to configure filters on internet routers "smackedass" <> wrote in message news:wk1ke.5465$ ink.net... > Hello, > > Opinions, please: > > Is the XP firewall sufficient enough firewall protection, without using > any other third-party products? > > Am only asking about firewall protection, not virus and spyware > protection. > > Many of the new boxes from Dell, Compaq, and HP, that are running XP SP2, > also have either McAfee Security or NIS 3-month subscriptions, and, apart > from the virus protection that they provide, I don't know what the > incentive is to buy a yearly subsription to either of these programs. > > I've been trying to figure out if Mcafee Security or NIS provide any > better firewall protection than XP SP2. > > Then there the other products, most notably Zone Alarm. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, in advance. > > smackedass > MF |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to activate Remote Assistance with XP using Windows Live Messenger | Oziisr | General Help Related Topics | 0 | 02-01-2008 04:45 PM |
| Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? | Eric Eastridge | A+ Certification | 1 | 06-18-2005 09:08 PM |
| Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? | A | A+ Certification | 1 | 05-28-2005 03:19 AM |
| Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? | Andrew | A+ Certification | 7 | 05-24-2005 05:13 PM |
| Re: XP Firewall sufficient by itself? | Tom MacIntyre | A+ Certification | 0 | 05-23-2005 03:23 PM |