![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
"Barry Watzman" <> wrote in message news:... > Re: "all her device drivers for her printer and scanner and modem are > designed for 98se or me, will 2000 be able to use these??" > > There is no absolute way to answer that question without actually trying > it or getting more information. The broad, general answer is "no", but > some 98SE and ME drivers will work under 2000, some 2000 drivers will > work under XP. Some, but not all. > > Although you didn't ask, in general, I'd say don't install 2000, install > XP. But on a computer originally designed for and supplied with ME, > there is a question as to whether or not the resources will be adequate > (for EITHER 2K or XP). Further, that's an old enough computer that the > real answer may be a whole new computer. > > > > > jason wrote: > > > I have a clients computer that is currently running Windows ME, of course > > she is having trouble with freeze ups and spontaineous reboots, she wants > > 2000 put on there. My question is, all her device drivers for her printer > > and scanner and modem are designed for 98se or me, will 2000 be able to use > > these Start here for drivers... www.driversguide.com name: drivers password: all -- <B0N3H3@D> "I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious." Albert Einstein «bonehead;\) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
You all are a bunch of prudes.
First of all any box that shipped with ME is fairly recent. Most likely not even 4 years old yet. Many may think that is ancient in computer world (it is) but in reality its not. The poster asked a fairly dumb question. Most devices that were built and sold with ME drivers generally have 2k drivers (its the same era). The poster should check the manufactures website (or even the origional CD). Now if this person has a printer that she had since windows for workgroups I can see where there might be an issue. Spontainous reboots. Very well could be ME - Worst OS EVER! the yeti |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Sep 15, 2004 at 8:51am "ImhoTech" blathered:
> ME sucks, primarily for the fact that it existed only as a money grab for > Micrsoft. The only actual improvement was a larger driver database, that > could have been free update to 98. > That being said, there is no innate reason ME can't be made to run stable, > though I would still prefer 98 over ME. Well, well, well. Didn't you call me an "ignorant ****" a couple months ago for espousing the exact same opinion? "The relative quality of the OS is a non-issue", isn't it? news: -- TechGeekPro, MCNGP #36 MCNGP.com - We're here to help! Not only am I certified, I'm certifiable. TechGeekPro |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: 98 and 2000 drivers | G W | A+ Certification | 0 | 10-30-2004 12:14 AM |
| Re: 98 and 2000 drivers | Tom MacIntyre | A+ Certification | 0 | 09-13-2004 08:50 PM |
| Re: 98 and 2000 drivers | Bob Schmidt | A+ Certification | 0 | 09-13-2004 07:32 PM |
| Re: 98 and 2000 drivers | Bill | A+ Certification | 0 | 09-13-2004 09:50 AM |
| Re: 98 and 2000 drivers | Jason Wheeler | A+ Certification | 0 | 09-13-2004 04:17 AM |