In article <>,
says...
>
>Re: ">Of course you do, if you agreed with Barry you would have to admit
>your own
> >>failure and accept responsibility for it.
>
>
>See how well that wisdom goes over in a rape crisis center sometime, troll."
>
>I'm sorry, but you are the troll.
>
No need to be sorry, Barry, because I'm not the troll!!! YIPEE!!!!
>People are not responsible for everything that happens to them. But you
>seem to be taking a position that they therefore are not responsible for
>ANYTHING that happens to them.
no that is not the position I seem to be taking because it isn't the position I
have ever taken. The position ImhoTech is taking is a misinterpretation of
social-darwinian rhetoric, which says that people are ALWAYS responsible for
anything that happens to them.
Would you like to debate cause & effect with me, Mr. Watzman? I'm well versed
in the subject.
>
>A woman does not deserve to be raped no matter what; not even if she
>consents to having sex with someone and changes her mind immediately
>prior to the act.
>
>But a person is totally responsible for their own ability to learn
>material that is "learnable" by anyone of average (or even below
>average) ability -- WITH EFFORT. It's not supposed to be "effortless".
I guess your hope here is that if you claim that the material can be learned
'with effort', even by those with a 'below average ability' (whatever that
means), you can shame me into submitting to the authority of this test. But I
know that have 'above average ability' and that I put far more effort into
studying for A+ than the stupid cert is worth, and that it I found it difficult
to pass inspite of being very familiar with the material covered in the
objectives.
I stick to my claim, the test is easy to pass if you memorize braindumps but
can be difficult to pass if you don't. I also think that some of the people
who think they passed without memorizing braindumps actually passed because
they memorized braindumps.