Tony Sivori <> wrote in message news:<>...
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 15:09:15 -0700, Jeremy Powlick wrote:
>
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > First post here.
>
> Welcome. This group was indispensable to me when I was studying for the
> A+, I trust it will be valuable for you too.
>
> > By mid December I plan to take the A+ exam, and wanted to challenge
> > myself a bit more with waiting for the updated, linear 2003 objectives.
> >
> > Because I am on a tight budget (rubbing pennies here) thanks to student
> > and private loan repayments and scaling back "Wally World" work hours to
> > study, I've opted to use the library's system of trading books
> > throughout the state. More exactly known as
> > http://accesspa.state.pa.us/
> >
> > The most up-to-date Meyers All-In-One A+ Certification Exam book I found
> > to borrow was the 3rd Edition. What is the difference between the 3rd
> > edition and the 4th edition? Is there that much signifigance that I
> > would be advised to purchase the 4th edition?
>
> The most important difference between the 3rd and 4th edition is errata
> correction. If you decide to use the 3rd edition All In One, be sure to go
> to the Total Seminars website and correct the list of typos before you
> start studying.
>
> http://www.totalsem.com/support/errata/index.htm
>
> But since you have already decided to wait to take the new test (a good
> decision, IMO), my advice would be to wait and buy the 5th edition.
> Assuming the retail price stays the same (at $60), you could pay for it
> with a single extra day at Wally World. It will be money well spent.
>
> Also, you can usually get the book at a discount by several methods. You
> can get a discount by buying it straight from Mike, or from Amazon, or if
> you have a Books a Million nearby, get one of their discount cards.
>
> Mike's Passport to A+ is good too, and a lot shorter than the All In One.
> I used both books, and the All In One is a great in depth resource, while
> the Passport is a great no extras study guide. The Passport is cheaper
> too, at half the price of the All In One.
>
> > I logically figure if the 3rd edition makes up most of the test, all I
> > need is supplemental information to make sure I know Windows ME and XP,
> > and the most recent hardware changes. I currently run Windows XP: Home
> > Edition. So I'm familiar with that at least and Windows 98 SE (though
> > not familiar with Windows ME). As for hardware changes, I read articles
> > on the net and in Maximum PC magazine. Plus, I inherently have a tech
> > lust that I cannot afford. So that's a bonus. Any suggestions to cover
> > the updated 2003 hardware and OS objectives?
>
> http://www.comptia.org/certification/A/objectives.asp
> http://www.comptia.org/certification...ectives_03.asp
>
> > In other words, any books to recommend (even older ones)? Then again, I
> > am tempted to simply purchase Sybex's and David Groth's, "A+ Complete
> > Study Guide, Third Edition (220-301 and 220-302)", which covers, of
> > course, the new 2003 objectives. Any thoughts here?
>
> Mike's books for the current (but soon to expire) test objectives; Mike's
> A+ books were considered by most to be considerably better than Groth's.
>
> This is not a put down of David Groth, for instance his Network + is
> considered by most to be much better than Mike's Network + book. I bought
> David's Network + book and I like it. But Mike's new A+, as far as I know,
> is yet to be released so no one knows which author will have the best book
> for the new A+ objectives.
>
> > Lastly, the CS degree question: I took up schooling at
> > http://www.fullsail.com for Game Development and Design, dropped out
> > before I could crash, burnout completely, and fail. Thereafter I
> > realized through that experience, in hindsight, that I should have
> > remained patient, gone for a normal college BS in Computer Science,
> > which would have give me more options. Are certifications such as A+,
> > outside of a 4 year college education *enough* to at least get my foot
> > in most IT interviews?
>
> No. The A+ alone will not get you an interview for most IT jobs. In terms
> of expense, time and intellectual effort the A+ is trivially easy to get
> compared to a CS degree. It is treated accordingly.
>
> The IT sector is suffering terribly from the bad economy (I am assuming
> from your IP that you are in the U.S.), export of tech jobs to India, and
> the dot.com collapse. People with years of experience are sometimes
> competing for entry level jobs. This makes it particularly difficult for
> those with no experience.
>
> > Bottom line: My goal is to become an application programmer either in
> > Java or C++, pay off my loans, and then maybe get fully into
> > professional game programming (AI, graphics). First step, segueing into
> > the IT industry through various certs, since I cannot afford a college
> > education for at least close to a decade. Second, step aquire $8-$10
> > job as a PC tech, starting out as I study programming on the side
> > (thereby working up the IT ladder) Is this, albeit rough and not
> > fleshed out strategy sound thus far?
>
> That is a realistic target wage for a beginning A+ tech. But if your
> ultimate goal is to be a programmer, it seems to me that the A+ track is a
> meaningless diversion of time and resources.
----------------------------------------------------
First off, thank you for reply to the post. In admitting I don't know
it all, I figure I can learn something new, before delving into a test
and path that I may or may not need or favor.
Now to reply to some particular comments of yours....
> But since you have already decided to wait to take the new test (a good
> decision, IMO), my advice would be to wait and buy the 5th edition.
> Assuming the retail price stays the same (at $60), you could pay for it
> with a single extra day at Wally World. It will be money well spent.
That deliberation seems to make the most logical sense. My impatience
begs of me to further my studies *NOW* rather then wait. But seeing
that Meyers' books is highly esteemed, waiting is the best option. My
question is when, when, when will it come out?!
Grr... !! Idea !! However, while I *do* wait, I can borrow the 3rd
edition from the library. Yes! That's it! Thanks for your
well-taken point here.
> Mike's books for the current (but soon to expire) test objectives; Mike's
> A+ books were considered by most to be considerably better than Groth's.
>
> This is not a put down of David Groth, for instance his Network + is
> considered by most to be much better than Mike's Network + book. I bought
> David's Network + book and I like it. But Mike's new A+, as far as I know,
> is yet to be released so no one knows which author will have the best book
> for the new A+ objectives.
Thank you for that point as well. Agreed.
> No. The A+ alone will not get you an interview for most IT jobs. In terms
> of expense, time and intellectual effort the A+ is trivially easy to get
> compared to a CS degree. It is treated accordingly.
Concurred. Nothing outside of a CS degree replaces a CS degree.
To be more explicit, I have at least two friends who can get me an
interview with a big company with only an A+ certification. Being
that I work at Wal-mart (earning $7 an hour), even if I earn a dollar
or two more, I would consider it a "win" in that I am working in the
IT field, getting paid slightly better as to pay off my loans more
quickly.
When my student and private loans *are* paid off, then I will
certainly go to a 4 year college to attain a CS degree.
Figuring between now and then, I can learn about hardware and OSes
more in depth, attain the A+ certification. Study software
programming, attain an MS certification or two. As I see it, skills
+ certifications = best opportunity for an entry-level job, in the
interim (and without the CS degree, for now).
> The IT sector is suffering terribly from the bad economy (I am assuming
> from your IP that you are in the U.S.), export of tech jobs to India, and
> the dot.com collapse. People with years of experience are sometimes
> competing for entry level jobs. This makes it particularly difficult for
> those with no experience.
Yes, I am in the U.S.
I've not had the first-hand experience of seeing the tech sector
suffer as much as people say, except to read what I see online and see
the news on TV. Maybe my optimisim is merely a blindfold over my eyes.
But simply, where I want to be and what I want to be involved with is
computer technology.
> That is a realistic target wage for a beginning A+ tech. But if your
> ultimate goal is to be a programmer, it seems to me that the A+ track is a
> meaningless diversion of time and resources.
Well, I see the A+ certification as a "stop-gap" solution. I need to
use my mind in some job facet instead of stocking freight and
servicing customers in a Wal-mart deli.
In fact, I've requested to be transferred over to their electronics
department, simply because I'll be near technology, with a chance to
answer technical questions, thereby using my mind at work as well as
at home, rather then allowing it to atrophy during part of a day.
Yet, I see that as not challenging enough. Henceforth, why I am going
for the A+ certification. To at least have a shot, to be put into a
better position at gaining something more intellectual.
More graphically, my mind is like Pac-man, consuming and using
information, because I love to explore the wonderous, curious maze of
technology.
Yes, programming is my goal. But I'll take what I can get, for now,
and work my way there. A+ is but a small step, however tiny it may
be. Again, I welcome your thoughts here, as well, for further
discourse.
Finally, since I'm rather new to Usenet, any etiquette advise or
otherwise annoying things I have done here that need constructive
criticism - feel free to make them known to me. I have an
appreciation of efficiency for both the readers and user. ^_-