XP sp1 and sp2 have digital signatures. If a file has a digital signature
that is valid, doesn't that mean that the file has not been tampered with?
If this is the case, that is why I ask, I don't want to apply a service pack
to my machine that has been tampered with in transit.
"Wayne" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Why would it have one? It's an executable than expands into a multitude of
> different files, some of those may be digitally signed, some may not. Or
> are you asking why there's no MD5 hash or similar?
>
> Wayne McGlinn
> Brisbane, Oz
>
> "Nergalsharazer" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> Is sp1 rc1 for the 2003 server products supposed to have a digital
>> signature. I just downloaded it and my download doesn't have one.
>>
>
>
|