«

On Thu, 13 May 2004 12:09:50 -0700, Neil extemporised:

> ??? are you indicating I'm not reputable!!!???!!! WHY I OUGHTA...
>
> (actually I can't back up the reputable. I'm a pretty good trainer but most
> would agree I'm more of the ill-repute category <grin>)
>
> hey JaR! did ya notice I didn't resort to guns? I... AM.... CANADIAN!!!

Yes, you have a history of bringing a knife to a gunfight.

Going to a battle of wits unarmed.

Starting the race with an empty tank.

Taking off shy a wing.

Launching the canoe without a paddle.

In short, why yes! You must be Canadian!

*hunkers down behind sandbags and dons helmet*

JaR
Instigating Thug

JaR <> wrote in
news:

> On Thu, 13 May 2004 23:10:46 +1000, Seth extemporised:
>
>> so your saying $1400 for self study via website and media (books,
>> cdroms) for a MCSA is ludicrious???
>>
>>
>
> Nope. Especially if it includes the cost of the test vouchers. All I'm
> saying is you could use the money to set up a test lab, buy the books,
> get the eval versions of the software, and do it yourself.
>
> JaR
> MCSA A+ Net+ MCNGP #10110

pffft. you being too gentle here JaR. YES IT'S LUDICRIOUS!!! do you plan
on studing for more than just these few tests. $1400 will buy a computer
and a couple of books, and maybe even a copy of vmware. then you get a
pile of evals (not just windows, but exchange, SQL, SMS, ISA hell go to
town) and prep for a few exams and get teh full MCSE. maybe the
MCSE:Exchange. but I doubt $1400 would cover vouchers as well.

--
Neil MCNGP #30 (MCSE+I, MCSA, MCDBA, MCT, A+, Net+, Server+,
Compaq ASE, HP CSC, CCDA...ok I'm on the second line so I'll quit)
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

> hey JaR! did ya notice I didn't resort to guns? I... AM.... CANADIAN!!!

What's wrong with guns?

JaR <> wrote in
news:

> JaR
> Instigating Thug

i personally would not bring anything to a gun fight. I'd be willing to
send a nuke in my place though.

(actually, being Canadian forces me to smile and say "Peace keeping" and
tell you "no we don't have any weapons! nope no we don't!".

As a side issue, check in on the major US conflicts of the past 100 years
that Canada did not paricipate in. Like Vietnam. How is that Iraq thing
working out for you? and can you say 1812?)

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in
news::

>> hey JaR! did ya notice I didn't resort to guns? I... AM.... CANADIAN!!!
>
> What's wrong with guns?
>
>
>

chemical weapons are more effective...

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

> As a side issue, check in on the major US conflicts of the past 100 years
> that Canada did not paricipate in. Like Vietnam. How is that Iraq thing
> working out for you? and can you say 1812?)

I had no idea Canada was the reason the US won WWII.


how ignorant I have been...


the shame...

> chemical weapons are more effective...

At doing what? They certainly are not more effective at destroying clay
targets.

On Thu, 13 May 2004 12:50:37 -0700, Neil extemporised:

> As a side issue, check in on the major US conflicts of the past 100 years
> that Canada did not paricipate in. Like Vietnam. How is that Iraq thing
> working out for you? and can you say 1812?)

There's a point there, somewhere. I'm sure of it.

Danged if I can find it, though.

JaR
Baffled Thug

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in
news::

>> As a side issue, check in on the major US conflicts of the past 100
>> years that Canada did not paricipate in. Like Vietnam. How is that
>> Iraq thing working out for you? and can you say 1812?)
>
> I had no idea Canada was the reason the US won WWII.
>
>
> how ignorant I have been...
>
>
> the shame...
>
>
>

I forgive you...

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

JaR <> wrote in
news:

> On Thu, 13 May 2004 12:50:37 -0700, Neil extemporised:
>
>> As a side issue, check in on the major US conflicts of the past 100
>> years that Canada did not paricipate in. Like Vietnam. How is that
>> Iraq thing working out for you? and can you say 1812?)
>
> There's a point there, somewhere. I'm sure of it.
>
> Danged if I can find it, though.
>
> JaR
> Baffled Thug
>

my work here is done

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"