Jonathan Roberts <> wrote in
news::
> To be honest, I felt like you were flaming my response. If I sounded
> that way in return, it was probably just an instinctual reaction. I
> trust you understand how emails and posts can be mis-read by any
> party, etc.
>
> Jonathan
I wasn't flaming. If I wanted to flame, I'd start digging and then come
back with an arsenal. Swat flies with nuclear weapons, no? Either way,
misunderstandings can happen so I mis-read your "What is your point?"
and took that a bit too seriously. You have my apologies.
And Michael D. Alligood, this is for you:
Don't ever think that the MCNGP is something that you already have an
idea of. Presuming to think to know of what or who we are is silly and
premature since you are not an MCNGP. The acronym is a joke, obviously.
Reading the website is just the beginning. Think deeper. Not all of us
troll on cyberspace all day

Some of us actually do have activities
that are far beyond a simple acronym that we bring to the table. We
simply all hold one thing in common, the aforementioned guidelines on
the website (at
www.mcngp.com) and the NDA on tests are non-negotiable
and breaking them holds serious consequenses.
Sometimes, its not all fun and games. Sometimes it is. Some of us come
here to let our stress out on the willing in a twisted tale of S&M via
UseNet because we've had a bad day at work. For me, I write because I
write. I motivate and attempt to inspire. Maybe I have been a bit lax
on those two things lately, but its all slowly coming back to me
designing my website. Go register at either the MCNGP site or my site,
or both. I encourage you and anyone else to do so.
--
Lasher
MCNGP #50
www.mcngp.com > all
MCNGP: Leading the world to better training, better computer skills,
and taking out the lowdes of the world with fervor beyond anyone's
belief.
www.turkreno.com