Starrynight
According to the Prometric URL, any student or faculty member at an
"accredited" institution can take advantage of the offer. This may exclude
some for profit schools but any university or college in the US should
qualify. The URL does not say how you show proof of enrollment and none of
my students have tested yet under the discount so I can't provide any help
there either
The one catch is that you need to take the exams at a college with a
Prometric testing center (or what is referred to as an AATC). You cannot
take the reduced price exams at a CTEC or other commercial testing center
location. The URL below can also direct you to AATC's in different states
throughout the country.
Good luck on your exams!
Who is eligible to take advantage of the AATC reduced exam price?
The AATC reduced exam pricing is offered only to students and instructors
who currently attend, or are employed by, a high school or accredited
post-secondary school. These exams must be taken at a Thomson Prometric
AATC.
"starrynight" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Hello folks. I appreciate the posting for the info on 'Second Shot
Testing'.
> However I am unclear about something. Do you have to be enrolled at
certain
> schools to receive this? Or are there only certain schools participating
in
> the deal. If you've got any info let me know.
> http://www.prometric.com/Microsoft/MSAATP/default.htm
>
> Thanks bunches,
>
> -Starrynight
>
>
> "Dave" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > "Jason" <> wrote in message
> > news:...
> >> Wait a minute Dave. Let's gain some perspective here. I am not
> >> necessarily
> >> a huge fan of Microsoft, but this discount given to U.S. residents is a
> >> pittance compared to what we have lost in overseas off-shoring of entry
> >> level DST jobs. So a resident saves $60 on an exam over a techie
> >> overseas.
> >> Big deal! Who is more likely to get an entry level job? Given the
> >> off-shoring phenomenon lately, I'd say the overseas dude will. Small
> >> price
> >> to pay for job security. I would gladly pay an extra $60 if I knew it
> >> meant
> >> a choice of jobs and my ability to obtain a job would increase due to
> >> that
> >> cert I am working on achieving.
> >
> > The US is not the only country whose workforce is under threat from
> > outsourcing or "off-shoring" of jobs.
> >
> >> On top of that, the average entry level DST is now based overseas in
> >> India,
> >> the Phillipines, or some other country where the tech may be "fluent"
in
> >> English, but cannot be understood by most people who speak English
> >> natively.
> >> A large portion of those people that need the assistance of an entry
> >> level
> >> DST are close to, if not completely computer-illiterate, and many times
> >> elderly. The language barrier makes it near impossible to understand
> >> each
> >> other. In addition, technically fluent people who clearly need senior
> >> level
> >> tech support when dealing with IT vendors and such must now wade
through
> >> the
> >> masses of you overseas individuals who took our jobs and hugely
annoying
> >> computerized messages and terrible wait times while the overseas tech
> >> takes
> >> 20 minutes to answer a question that would be handled in 5 minutes by
> >> someone without a language barrier.
> >
> > Yes, I fully understand the fluency issue as it was us here in the UK
who
> > invented the language. Ok, so there may well be linguisic influences
from
> > other Europen countries but it is primarilly an English language from
> > England and as I am English I happen to be a bit better qualified than
> > most to talk about it.
> >
> >> If I may be so bold as to make a few suggestions:
> >> 1. Pay the extra money and be happy jobs are competing for you instead
> >> of
> >> vice versa.
> > Not exactly the case here.
> >
> >> 2. Stop asking us for access to free study resources and learn it the
> >> right
> >> way like we did.
> > Since when have I **ever** asked for a free study resource?
> >
> >> 3. Stop complaining about your "overseas predicament" and appreciate
> >> what
> >> you are getting in return.
> > Er, like what?
> >
> >
>
>