Congratulations for both of you.
Jackie, may I ask what's your background and experience.
It's really suprising that you passed 3 exams in 3 months
and I hope I can do it too.
BTW, did you use any books and/or test software for
preparing 315, 320, 316?
Jiang
>-----Original Message-----
>Hi Pete,
>as you know, I took 315 then 320 then 316. That order
>worked for me because 315 is asp.net and web services
>which set me up well for the services and components.
Alot
>of 320 was a review and more in-depth information that
was
>in 315 with addition stuff about the CLR search paths and
>COM and COM+. Then 316 was just a review of much of 315
>(without asp.net) and 320 plus the printing and drawing
>thrown in.
>
>The exam for 316 read alot like 315. I don't think I got
>any printing or drawing questions on mine. Mostly ADO.net
>which was covered in 315. But then again, I didn't get a
>really high score so maybe I wasn't reading the questions
>very well.
>
>Good luck! Which did you decide to do next? I'm going to
>tackel Viera's Professional SQL Server 2000 book and I
>think I'll get the transcender test for 70-229. I plan on
>taking about 2 months(1 month to go through the book,
then
>the practice tests, then re-study as necessary) for this
>one instead of the 2 and 3 weeks that I did for the other
>3 tests. I did those from 1/10 to 4/3 Just under 3 months.
>
>Jackie
>>-----Original Message-----
>>congradulations, how was 70-320 compared to 315 and 316?
>>Pete
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>I just got home after taking the 316. I kept thinking
>>this
>>>test is a joke. It seemed so easy. All the while I was
>>>clicking the wrong answers! I just barely passed. My
>>>lowest score of the 3 but a passing score and now I
have
>>>achieved the MCAD.
>>>
>>>Now has anyone recently passed the 229? What study
>>>material do you suggests. Thanks.
>>>.
>>>
>>.
>>
>.
>
|