| Home | Forums | Reviews | Guides | Newsgroups | Register | Search |
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Neredbojias wrote:
> On 03 Jan 2009, Ramon <> wrote: > >> Does someone here knows if there exists a tag that can fold/hide >> text... and when the user clicks it, the text will become visible. > > How would the user be able to click it when it's invisible? nitpick!  -- Els http://locusmeus.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Neredbojias wrote:
> On 03 Jan 2009, Ramon <> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does someone here knows if there exists a tag that can fold/hide >> text... and when the user clicks it, the text will become visible. >> >> Thanks > > How would the user be able to click it when it's invisible? > What I meant is that you have something like this: [+] Click here to see more information. When the user clicks on the [+], he/she will see something like this: [+] Click here to see more information. Some text here that the user could not see before -- thus invisible  Other text here ... Is is possible in HTML? |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ramon wrote:
>>> Does someone here knows if there exists a tag that can fold/hide >>> text... and when the user clicks it, the text will become visible. >>> >>> Thanks >> >> How would the user be able to click it when it's invisible? The answer to that question is obviously "by accident", though some people may include the possibility of "by miracle". > What I meant is that you have something like this: > [+] Click here to see more information. > > When the user clicks on the [+], he/she will see something like this: > [+] Click here to see more information. > Some text here that the user could not see > before -- thus invisible > Other text here ... It's generally useful to ask what you really want, instead of something quite different. It is also a good idea to write a Subject line that gives at least a subtle hint of a clue of an allusion to what the content is about. It's generally useful to present your content to users without hiding it in elaborate ways that generally exhibit poor accessibility, poor usability, and poor style. "Click here" is virtually always bad style. > Is is possible in HTML? No. You need to study an introduction to the basics of HTML if you had the idea that it could be. HTML is poor lonesome data format, not a programming language or even a style language. Well of course it _is_ possible in the sense that "[+]" could be a link pointing to a page that differs from the current one only so that there is the additional content there (and the content after it is pushed downwards of course). But that's hardly what you meant. What people normally use to do things like you describe is a combination of JavaScript and CSS; naturally there needs to be some marked-up data (i.e., HTML stuff) for them to play with. And sometimes people use just CSS (playing on HTML of course), though then the user just mouses over instead of clicking. It can be fun, to an author, but it's normally not useful. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/ |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> Ramon wrote: > >>>> Does someone here knows if there exists a tag that can fold/hide >>>> text... and when the user clicks it, the text will become visible. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> >>> How would the user be able to click it when it's invisible? > > The answer to that question is obviously "by accident", though some > people may include the possibility of "by miracle". > >> What I meant is that you have something like this: >> [+] Click here to see more information. >> >> When the user clicks on the [+], he/she will see something like this: >> [+] Click here to see more information. >> Some text here that the user could not see >> before -- thus invisible >> Other text here ... > > It's generally useful to ask what you really want, instead of something > quite different. It is also a good idea to write a Subject line that > gives at least a subtle hint of a clue of an allusion to what the > content is about. > > It's generally useful to present your content to users without hiding it > in elaborate ways that generally exhibit poor accessibility, poor > usability, and poor style. "Click here" is virtually always bad style. > >> Is is possible in HTML? > > No. You need to study an introduction to the basics of HTML if you had > the idea that it could be. HTML is poor lonesome data format, not a > programming language or even a style language. > > Well of course it _is_ possible in the sense that "[+]" could be a link > pointing to a page that differs from the current one only so that there > is the additional content there (and the content after it is pushed > downwards of course). But that's hardly what you meant. > > What people normally use to do things like you describe is a combination > of JavaScript and CSS; naturally there needs to be some marked-up data > (i.e., HTML stuff) for them to play with. And sometimes people use just > CSS (playing on HTML of course), though then the user just mouses over > instead of clicking. It can be fun, to an author, but it's normally not > useful. > Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASP.NET won't retrieve query results that depend on union query | Eric Nelson | ASP .Net | 5 | 02-04-2009 10:51 PM |
| Trying to query the Address table data of AdventureWorks database from Query Analyzer - need help! | Learner | ASP .Net | 1 | 01-30-2006 08:58 PM |
| Build dynamic sql query for JSTL <sql:query> | Anonymous | Java | 0 | 10-13-2005 10:01 PM |
| xpath query query | David Gordon | XML | 2 | 05-18-2005 03:33 PM |
| CAML Query: Multiple Query Fields Issue | Jon F. | ASP .Net Web Services | 0 | 05-12-2004 08:19 PM |
