Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Els wrote:
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Dec 2008, Els <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tim Greer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Same for OE, who uses OE these days,
>>>> I do. I have HTML disabled, and it works perfectly. Yes I've tried
>>>> Thunderbird, but it has a couple of downsides that OE doesn't have.
>>>> OE's downsides are cured with Quotefix.
>>>
>>> What downsides?
>>
>> Of OE, or Thunderbird?
>
> Of Thunderbird,
I've downloaded and installed TB again today, just to see if anything
had changed since I checked last time, and that appears to be the
case. My main gripe was that when replying back and forth a couple of
times, the skipped lines between the replies were adding every time.
Start with one skipped line, reply, and it has become 2 lines, reply
again, and there's a space of 3 lines.
They seem to have solved that now, and it now only looks like lines
are added. The space still gets larger, but it's not an actual empty
line, but merely a visual thing - the larger the indent for replied to
text, the larger also the distance vertically.
I prefer regular indent markers. When composing without HTML, it looks
fine, regular markers for replied to text, with an added marker for
each level. But when reading received email, even in plain text, the
markers are gone and instead there's coloured vertical lines. Somehow
they don't behave logical to me, I really prefer the OE-Quotefix
system.
> I can tell you downsides of OE which Quotefix doesn't fix...
I don't doubt that

But they're probably downsides that don't effect me - I have no
problem at all with OE/Quotefix.
I do know one advantage of Thunderbird that OE doesn't have, which I
might use once in a while if I'd use TB: the portable version - load
TB on a USB stick, and have access to your email regardless of which
computer you're on. Not important enough to me to switch though.
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/