![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
MCSE - modem in practices on 70-291 microsoft press book |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hello,
I use Virtual Server to follow along with the practices in the 70-291. The RRAS chapters use modems in some of the practice tests. My Virtual Server hardware doesn't have any modems... should I just use NICs and not worry about the dialing configuration practices? I guess I could just read about the call back features for example, but I would really like to follow the practices closely. Should I be concerned that I'll not have the hands on experience with modems? btw... who the hell uses modems anymore!?!? ISApose |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"ISApose" <> wrote in message
news:4C5E75C1-B954-4F60-8002-... > Hello, > > I use Virtual Server to follow along with the practices in the 70-291. > The > RRAS chapters use modems in some of the practice tests. > > My Virtual Server hardware doesn't have any modems... should I just use > NICs > and not worry about the dialing configuration practices? > > I guess I could just read about the call back features for example, but I > would really like to follow the practices closely. > > Should I be concerned that I'll not have the hands on experience with > modems? Unless you're obsessed with the remote possibility of obtaining a perfect score, or you're not particularly concerned about the score itself, but just respectably passing the exam, my recommendation would be to simply skip over the dial-up-modem-based aspects of RRAS. > btw... who the hell uses modems anymore!?!? Probably nobody, but you have to put yourself in the perspective of the timeframe when the exams were written. Much of the MCSE:Windows Server 2003 exam content is simply "updated" exam content from the MCSE:Windows Server 2000 content, particulary that which did not significantly change between versions -- RRAS would be a prime example of this. Thus, the RRAS objectives likely date back to 1999/2000, and were simply carried forward without much practical review. In the end, I would imagine (and this is my philosphy in preparing for the -291, which I've not yet taken) that the real focus should be on the concepts and the administration, and the specific question of whether the physical topology is dial-up-modem, ISDN, LAN, or even wireless is probably of much less significance. In fact, to be entirely truthful, the entire RRAS product is pretty much dead weight these days. -- Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009) MS WSUS Website: http://www.microsoft.com/wsus My Websites: http://www.onsitechsolutions.com; http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/pro...awrence.Garvin Lawrence Garvin \(MVP\) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Lawrence Garvin (MVP)" wrote: > "ISApose" <> wrote in message > news:4C5E75C1-B954-4F60-8002-... > > Hello, > > > > I use Virtual Server to follow along with the practices in the 70-291. > > The > > RRAS chapters use modems in some of the practice tests. > > > > My Virtual Server hardware doesn't have any modems... should I just use > > NICs > > and not worry about the dialing configuration practices? > > > > I guess I could just read about the call back features for example, but I > > would really like to follow the practices closely. > > > > Should I be concerned that I'll not have the hands on experience with > > modems? > > Unless you're obsessed with the remote possibility of obtaining a perfect > score, > > or you're not particularly concerned about the score itself, but just > respectably passing the exam, > > my recommendation would be to simply skip over the dial-up-modem-based > aspects of RRAS. Thanks Lawrence, this helps a lot. I'm not really obsessing about a pefect score, it's just that I bombed the 291 the first time on the RRAS section and am freaking out about learning every aspect of it this time. > > > > btw... who the hell uses modems anymore!?!? > > Probably nobody, but you have to put yourself in the perspective of the > timeframe when the exams were written. > > Much of the MCSE:Windows Server 2003 exam content is simply "updated" exam > content from the MCSE:Windows Server 2000 content, particulary that which > did not significantly change between versions -- RRAS would be a prime > example of this. > > Thus, the RRAS objectives likely date back to 1999/2000, and were simply > carried forward without much practical review. > > In the end, I would imagine (and this is my philosphy in preparing for > the -291, which I've not yet taken) that the real focus should be on the > concepts and the administration, and the specific question of whether the > physical topology is dial-up-modem, ISDN, LAN, or even wireless is probably > of much less significance. > > In fact, to be entirely truthful, the entire RRAS product is pretty much > dead weight these days. GO ISA!! > > > -- > Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP > Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas > Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009) > > MS WSUS Website: http://www.microsoft.com/wsus > My Websites: http://www.onsitechsolutions.com; > http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com > My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/pro...awrence.Garvin > > ISApose |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"ISApose" <> wrote in message
news:037C25B5-C612-41BE-8ECC-... >> my recommendation would be to simply skip over the dial-up-modem-based >> aspects of RRAS. > Thanks Lawrence, this helps a lot. I'm not really obsessing about a > pefect > score, it's just that I bombed the 291 the first time on the RRAS section > and > am freaking out about learning every aspect of it this time. Ahhh!!... I see. Still, were you to encounter a question specifically involving the use of dial-up modems in RRAS, I'd be surprised if there were more than one. The functionality of RRAS isn't particularly different using modems than it is a LAN-based connection. I would imagine academic familiarity with the differences that involve dial-up technologies would be sufficient. Certainly there are no questions regarding modem diagnostics, or using the modem 'AT' command set. Note, also, that it's not impossible to simulate a modem connection between two virtual machines, but it's not particularly easy, either, unless you have pre-existing familiarity with serial port operations. If you have two COM ports on your system, you can assign a serial port to each VM, and use a null-modem cable to connect the two serial ports together. Now you have a simulation of a modem-based environment, albeit with the characteristic of a dedicated leased line, rather than using the PSTN. I doubt the effort is worth the reward, though. I would imagine your efforts would be better spent studying concepts and the actual administration interface. You won't be able to simulate modems (or LAN connections) in the testing environment either -- at best, on a simulation, you'd be asked to configured, diagnose, or repair an existing RRAS *configuration*, with the presumption that the physical data layer is functional (remember -- you're not being tested on modem diagnostics skills, only on *RRAS*). -- Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009) MS WSUS Website: http://www.microsoft.com/wsus My Websites: http://www.onsitechsolutions.com; http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/pro...awrence.Garvin Lawrence Garvin \(MVP\) |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The summary of cancelled Microsoft exams before March 2008 | zhang | Software | 1 | 06-12-2008 04:03 AM |
| Computer Security | aldrich.chappel.com.use@gmail.com | A+ Certification | 0 | 11-27-2007 02:11 AM |
| OT: Certifications... Worth it? | Michael D. Alligood | MCTS | 12 | 04-10-2007 10:16 PM |
| OT: Certifications... Worth it? | Michael D. Alligood | MCITP | 12 | 04-10-2007 10:16 PM |
| Microsoft to Implement Worldwide Anti-Piracy Initiative | Bum | A+ Certification | 0 | 03-04-2005 08:28 PM |